Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm reading the paper "An Underdetermined Linear System for GPS" by Dan Kalman, and solving the equations. It's all going fine until near the bottom of page 388, where the equation $$0.02t^2-1.88t+43.56=0$$ is stated and subsequently solved:

[...] leading to two solutions, 43.1 and 50.0. If we select the first solution, then $(x, y, z) = (1.317, 1.317, 0.790)$, which has a length of about $2$. We are using units of earth radii, so this point is around 4000 miles above the surface of the earth. The second value of $t$ leads to $(x, y, z) = (.667, .667, .332)$, with length $0.9997$. That places the point on the surface of the earth (to four decimal places) and gives us the location of the ship.

My question is how he got the values 43.1 and 50.0? Every time I solve it, using the quadratic formula, I get 41.4 and 52.5, which is different.

Here's the link for the paper (it's only 7 pages long):

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 3 down vote accepted

Above your given equation there is another one, not simplified $$(5.41 − 0.095t − 1)^2 + (5.41 − 0.095t − 2)^2 + (3.67 − 0.067t)^2 = 0.047^2(t − 19.9)^2$$ which gives more accurate form $$0.02033^2-1.8896618t+43.67031391=0$$ and it has roots $49.913...$, $43.035...$. So you shouldn't worry, all these errors are because of rounding

share|cite|improve this answer
thanks very much – HATEM EL-AZAB Apr 15 '12 at 15:20

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.