Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I want to classify all unitary representations of $GL(2,\mathbb{C})$ from the representation theory of $SL(2, \mathbb{C})$. Is this possible? Knapp claims that one obtains all irreducible representation by pasting a character on $\mathbb{C}^\times$, which coincides on $-1$ onto $SL(2, \mathbb{C})$ and that one exhausts in this fashion all irreducible representation, but I worry about the well definedness of the square root $g \mapsto \sqrt{\det g}$. How does this work?

Alternatively, a reference which list all irreducible representations is also enough for my current purpose.

share|improve this question
2  
Dear late_learner, It's slightly more subtle than Knapp suggests, although the general principle is correct. Have you looked in the {\em Corvalis} volumes? Best wishes, –  Matt E Apr 14 '12 at 18:16
    
@Matt: You can get italics by enclosing text in asterisks like this: *Corvalis* produces Corvalis. –  joriki Apr 14 '12 at 21:54
    
@Joriki: Dear Joriki, Thanks for the reminder. Whenever I've been on stackexchange for a while, my LaTeX code ends up full of *'s, and when I've been typing papers for so long, I end up typing {\em } commands in MathSE posts. Ah well ... . Best wishes, –  Matt E Apr 14 '12 at 23:43
    
@Matt E: Yes, precisely, there I got the statement from on pag2 91, first volume. Where is the nitpick? I know how to inflate representations and how to twist by a character, but not how to paste a character. What does he mean, Obviously $SL_2(\mathbb{C})$ is not a quotient of $GL(2, \mathbb{C}$, but only $PSL(2, \mathbb{C}) \cong PGL_2(\mathbb{C})$ after fixing a branch for the square root. –  plusepsilon.de Apr 15 '12 at 9:34

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

The group $GL_2(\mathbb C)$ is the product of its centre $\mathbb C^{\times}$ and its subgroup $SL_2(\mathbb C)$. This product is not direct; the two subgroups intersect in $\{\pm 1\}$ (the centre of $SL_2(\mathbb C)$).

Suppose $\pi$ is an irred. unitary rep. of $SL_2(\mathbb C)$, and let $\varepsilon$ be the character through which $\{\pm 1\}$ acts on $\pi$. Choose an extension of $\epsilon$ to a unitary character of $\mathbb C^{\times}$. Then there is a unique extension of $\pi$ to a unitary rep. of $GL_2(\mathbb C)$, on which $\mathbb C^{\times}$ acts via the character $\chi$.

Conversely, any irred. unitary rep. of $GL_2(\mathbb C)$ arises from one of $SL_2(\mathbb C)$ by such a construction.

[The case of $GL_2(\mathbb R)$ is a little more subtle, and this is what I was thinking of when I wrote my comment above. The reason is that in this case $GL_2(\mathbb R)$ is not the product of its centre and $SL_2(\mathbb R)$, because the squaring map $\mathbb R^{\times} \to \mathbb R^{\times}$ --- which is what arises from restricting the determinant map to the centre of $GL_2$ --- is not surjective, unlike in the case of $GL_2(\mathbb C)$.]

share|improve this answer
    
In the mean-while, I have used Jacquet-Langlands for $GL(2, \mathbb{C})$ and then proven for unitary central character that unitarizability, temperedness and square integrability hold if only if it holds for the restriction to $SL_2(\mathbb{C})$. This strategies works for every local field, but assumes that we know the rough classification already and the fine for $SL(2, \mathbb{C})$ as given in Wallach. But your answer was really helpful. Thanks. –  plusepsilon.de Apr 15 '12 at 16:02

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.