Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I think this might be a stupid question.

The icosahedral group $A_5$ with order 60 is a simple group $60=2^2\times 3\times5$ but according to Sylow theorem $A_5$ must have subgroups of order 4. But that's contradictory to that $A_5$ is a simple group right ?

Is $A_5$ simple?

share|improve this question
3  
Why do the presence of subgroups of order 4 contradict simplicity? –  Mariano Suárez-Alvarez Apr 14 '12 at 2:50
    
I believe the icosahedral group is isomorphic to $A_5$ that is simple. –  user38268 Apr 14 '12 at 2:53
    
I observe 3 cathegories within all non normal subgroups of icosahedral group A_5. That is also why they cannot be bound by (only) one "p-cathegory".Pecik –  user39074 Aug 30 '12 at 12:36

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

You seem to be recalling the definition of a simple group incorrectly. A simple group is a group $G$ whose only normal subgroups are the trivial group and $G$ itself. None of the order $4$ subgroups of the icosahedral group (or any of the nontrivial proper subgroups, for that matter) are normal. $I$ is isomorphic to $A_5$, which is a well-known example of a simple group.

In fact, the only nontrivial groups with no nontrivial proper subgroups at all are $\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z}$, where $p$ is a prime.

share|improve this answer
    
I think I still didn't fully understand the definition of simple group, I am kind of comparing the definition of simple group to prime number, which seems to be incorrect. what does "normal subgroups are the trivial group and $G$ itself" means ? I explain it as has only subgroup ${1} and G$ –  zinking Apr 14 '12 at 3:13
    
By definition, a simple group has no nontrivial proper normal subgroups. A simple group $G$ can have a nontrivial proper subgroup $H$, but if $H$ is normal in $G$ then it must be that $H = 1$ or $H = G$. In other words, the only normal subgroups of a simple group $G$ are $1$ and $G$. This says nothing about the possibility of non-normal subgroups of $G$. –  Henry T. Horton Apr 14 '12 at 3:23
3  
@zinking: If you want to draw the analogy to prime numbers, note that the only subgroups by which you can "divide" a group (form a quotient) are normal subgroups. So if you want to define "simple group" as "has no nontrivial 'divisors'", then the "divisors" will refer to normal subgroups, not arbitrary subgroups. –  Arturo Magidin Apr 14 '12 at 3:52
    
thanks , get the idea now. –  zinking Apr 14 '12 at 3:52

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.