Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

If a fluid has the complex potential $$w(z)=\frac{-\Gamma i}{2 \pi}\operatorname{log}z$$ Can anyone show me how to find it's radial and transverse velocity components in polar coordinates?

They are meant to be $u_r=0$ and $u_\theta=\frac{\Gamma}{2r \pi}$

share|improve this question
    
Are you completely sure $u_r = 0$ ? –  Yrogirg Apr 13 '12 at 16:18
    
@Yrogirg: Yes, this is the complex potential for a vortex, probably should have mentioned that. –  Freeman Apr 13 '12 at 16:20

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

Oh, I've forgot, what is the complex potenial. So,

$$w = \varphi + i \psi$$

where $\varphi$ is a potential and $\psi$ is a stream function.

Thus, $\boldsymbol v = \text{grad} \varphi \;$:

$$v_r = \frac{\partial \varphi}{\partial r} = \text{Re} \left[ \frac{\partial \, w(r e^{i \varphi})}{\partial r} \right] $$

$$v_{\theta} = \frac{1}{r} \frac{\partial \varphi}{\partial \theta} = \text{Re} \left[ \frac{1}{r} \frac{\partial \, w(r e^{i \varphi})}{\partial \theta} \right] $$

You could use stream function $\psi$ instead of potential though.

I've used FriCAS to evaluate things to the answer:

(15) -> D(real(-G*%i/(2*%pi)*log(r*exp(%i*phi))),r)

   (15)  0

(16) -> D(1/r * real(-G*%i/(2*%pi)*log(r*exp(%i*phi))),phi)

            G
   (16)  ──────
         2%pi r
share|improve this answer
    
btw, one could swap Re and $\partial$, that is first differentiate, then take the real part. –  Yrogirg Apr 14 '12 at 4:58
    
Thank you, but could you explain in a little more detail how you found those expressions for $v_r,v_{\theta}$ and how they are implied from $v=\nabla \phi$ as I am unsure, thanks so much! –  Freeman Apr 15 '12 at 12:26
1  
Quick explanation --- That's just an expression for gradient in polar coordinates. Personally, I usually consult tables to look up for $\nabla$ or $\Delta$ in various coordinates. See for example en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… the part about cylindrical coordinates. Polar coordinates are just cylindrical without $z$. Check also math.stackexchange.com/questions/47618/… –  Yrogirg Apr 15 '12 at 14:59
    
Actually, If you thought $\text{grad} \varphi \;\;$ to be $\left( \frac{\partial \varphi}{\partial r}, \frac{\partial \varphi}{\partial \theta} \right) \;\;\;$ then it doesn't make sence due to inconsistent units. $\frac{\partial}{\partial r} \;\;$ divides by meters, while $\frac{\partial}{\partial \theta} \;\;$ is dimensionless. –  Yrogirg Apr 15 '12 at 15:13
    
I was using $\nabla \phi = (\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial x},\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial y})$ But I see now.. I proved these last year.. I guess i'll just have to remember them! Thank you so much for your help! –  Freeman Apr 15 '12 at 15:33

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.