Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $G$ be a linear algebraic group and $\phi$ a finite dimensional regular representation of $G$ into $GL(V)$

I would like to know about bilinear forms on $V$ and when they are $G$-invariant. Specifically, I want to show that a bilinear form $Z$ on $V$ is $G$-invariant if and only if

$Z(d\phi(X)(v),w)=-Z(v,d\phi(X)(w)) \\ \forall v, w \in V, and \forall X \in Lie(G)$

By $Lie(G)$ I mean the Lie algebra.

My definition of a $G$-invariant bilinear form is that $Z(\phi(g)(v),\phi(g)(w))=Z(v,w)$ for all $v,w$ in $V$ and for all $g \in G$. In the direction assuming that $Z$ is $G$-invariant, I don't see how to involve the Lie algebra. I also tried to think about where the minus sign could come up, to maybe find some idea in that way, but I could not solve it.

Assuming the identity, I am again faced with Lie algebras, where I need information about the representations of the group.

share|cite|improve this question

Just take the derivative of $Z(\phi(g)(v),\phi(g)(w) )=Z(v,w)$ and we get $\frac{d}{dt}Z(\phi(exp(tX))(v),\phi(exp(tX))(w))=0=Z(d\phi(X)(v),w)+Z(v, d\phi(X)(w)) $

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.