Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $\{X_1,X_2,\ldots,X_n\}$ be jointly Gaussian random variables of zero mean and variance $1$ with covariance matrix $K$. Let $Y=\max\{X_i\,:\,i=1,\ldots,n\}$.

In the case the variables are also independent ($K=I_{n}$) is a known result that $$ \mathbb{P}\Big[\lim_{n\to\infty}(2\log(n))^{-1/2}Y=1\Big]=1. $$

My question is: Is it true that for a general covariance matrix (with diagonal entries equal to one) then $$ \mathbb{P}\Big[\lim_{n\to\infty}(2\log(n))^{-1/2}Y\leq 1\Big]=1? $$ I'm only interested in the asymptotic behavior as $n$ increases.


share|cite|improve this question
What do you mean by "as big as possible"? – Dilip Sarwate Apr 10 '12 at 2:04
Among all the covariances $K$ such that $X_i$ has unit variance. – ght Apr 10 '12 at 2:12
You might want to say, not just that they are Gaussian, but that they are jointly Gaussian, i.e. so distributed that every linear combination of them is Gaussian. – Michael Hardy Apr 10 '12 at 2:37
I might interpret the question like this: $X$ is stochastically (weakly) bigger than $Y$ if for every real $x$, $\Pr(X>x)\ge\Pr(Y>x)$. That's a partial ordering. It could mean bigger in that sense. – Michael Hardy Apr 10 '12 at 2:41
I clarify what I mean by "as big as possible" but is along Micheal definition of weakly bigger. – ght Apr 10 '12 at 2:50

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.