Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Given a sequence $(b_n)_{n=1}^p$ of positive numbers such that $b_1>b_2>\cdots>b_p>0$, define $$\beta=\bigg(p!\frac{p}{p-1}\bigg)^{\frac{1}{\min\limits_{1\leq k\leq p-1}{(b_k-b_{k+1})}}}.$$ Suppose $a_i\in\mathbb{C},i=1,2,\cdots,p$ satisfies $|a_i|>\beta|a_{i+1}|, i=1,2,\cdots p-1$ and $|a_p|>1$. Prove the following matrix $$ D= \begin{pmatrix} a_{1}^{b_1} & a_{1} ^{b_2}& \dots & a_{1} ^{b_p}& \\ a_{2} ^{b_1}& a_{2} ^{b_2}& \dots &a_{2} ^{b_p}\\ \\ a_{p} ^{b_1}& a_{p} ^{b_2}& \dots & a_{p} ^{b_p} \end{pmatrix}$$ satisfies the following inequality: $$\frac{1}{p}\prod_{i=1}^{p}|a_i|^{b_i}<|\det(D)|<2\prod_{i=1}^{p}|a_i|^{b_i}.$$

share|cite|improve this question
If Riemann can't solve it, what can we do? :) Sorry for the off topic, couldn't resist. – N. S. Apr 9 '12 at 16:01
What is the context for this inequality? Why it should be true? – Beni Bogosel Apr 9 '12 at 16:34
Writing \det with a backslash in $\TeX$ does not just prevent italicization; it also provides for proper spacing and is standard usage. Correct: $a\det A$. Incorrect: $a det A$. I editing the question accordingly. – Michael Hardy Apr 9 '12 at 16:38
this question is from Graduate Admission Test for the AMSS OF CAS! – Riemann Apr 9 '12 at 16:40

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.