Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Why is the following series uniformly convergent:$$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty }(-1)^{n+1}\frac{1}{n}.e^{-nx}$$? where $ x\geq 0$

I tried the Weierstrass-M test, but it doesn't work here because:$\left | (-1)^{n+1}\frac{1}{n}.e^{-nx} \right |= \frac{1}{n}.e^{-nx}\leq \frac{1}{n}$, and $ \sum_{n=1}^{\infty }\frac{1}{n}$ is divergent.

share|cite|improve this question
Why dont you choose $\frac{1}{n(1+nx)}$ to compare to? Plus, for $x=0$, the series is conditionally convergent! – Pedro Tamaroff Apr 8 '12 at 0:18
Unless I'm missing something, this diverges if $x<0$. But I think it converges uniformly on $[0,\infty)$. – Michael Hardy Apr 8 '12 at 0:24
We can use Dirichlet test to deduce the uniform convergence on $[0, \infty)$. But if you want to work with Weierstrass M-test, it suffices to consider the partial sum with the first $2n$ terms. Grouping adjunct two terms, we obtain $$ \sum_{k=1}^{n} \frac{e^{-(2k-1)x} + (2k-1)xe^{-(2k-1)x}\left( \frac{1 - e^{-x}}{x} \right)}{(2k-1)(2k)}. $$ Note that the numerator is uniformly bounded by $$ 1 + \sup_{0 \leq t} \left( t e^{-t} \right) \sup_{0 \leq t} \left( \tfrac{1 - e^{-t}}{t} \right) < \infty $$ on $[0, \infty)$. Thus we obtain uniform convergence by Weierstrass M-test. – Sangchul Lee Apr 8 '12 at 0:30
I agree that $e^{-nx}\leq \frac{1}{n(1+nx)}$, but how does the uniform convergence follow? I can't see it, because you need to prove that $\frac{1}{n(1+nx)}$ is less than equal to $M_{n}$ where $\sum M_{n}$ is convergent. Can anayone provide more details? – M.Krov Apr 8 '12 at 0:30
I don´t know why Didier rejected this but $1/n(1+nx)<1/n^2$ for $x \neq 0$ – Pedro Tamaroff Apr 8 '12 at 16:49
up vote 8 down vote accepted

Given $m>n$, for $x\in[0,\infty)$, we have $$ \Bigl|\,\sum_{k=n}^m (-1)^{k+1}{1\over k}e^{-kx}\,\Bigr| \le {1\over n}e^{-nx}\le {1\over n}. $$

It follows that $\sum\limits_{n=1}^\infty (-1)^{n+1}{1\over n}e^{-nx}$ is uniformly Cauchy on $[0,\infty)$ and, thus, uniformly convergent on $[0,\infty)$.

Below, are sketched the first few partial sums $S_k=\sum\limits_{n=1}^k (-1)^{n+1}{1\over n} e^{-nx}$ of the series. Note how they "alternate":

enter image description here

More generally, if $(f_n)$ is a decreasing sequence of nonnegative functions that converge uniformly to $0$ on the set $I$, then the series $\sum\limits_{n=1}^\infty (-1)^n f_n$ is uniformly convergent on $I$.

share|cite|improve this answer
I was really impressed by your neat answer. Surely it is worth an upvote. Anyway, what graphic software did you use to plot? – Sangchul Lee Apr 8 '12 at 1:24
@sos440 JSXgraph. It's a Javascript library for interactive plotting (but also makes nice diagrams:)). – David Mitra Apr 8 '12 at 1:25
Wow, it's great! Thanks for recommending such a nice one! – Sangchul Lee Apr 8 '12 at 1:29
@M.Krov For fixed $x\ge0$, the sequence $(a_n)$ defined by $a_n={e^{-nx}\over n}$ is decreasing. So, $$|a_k|\ge |a_k-a_{k+1}|\ge |a_k-a_{k+1} +a_{k+2}|\ge\cdots.$$ It's just the argument from the proof that an alternating series converges. – David Mitra Apr 8 '12 at 1:56
@M.Krov Yes, that would work. But the argument I gave is entirely self contained. – David Mitra Apr 8 '12 at 2:28

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.