Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

We are told that

$$\displaystyle \int_0^x f(t) \, dt = 2\cos x + 3x + 2$$

and are asked to find $f$. If we apply the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, then

$$\displaystyle f(x) = \frac{d}{dx}\int_0^x f(t) \, dt = -2\sin x + 3$$

but

$$\displaystyle \int_0^x -2\sin t + 3 \, dt = 2\cos x+3x - 2$$

It seems to me that the problem stems from using the FTC: Since I don't know anything about $f$, I cannot apply it. My question is: How exactly do I go about finding $f$ ?

share|improve this question
8  
Something is not quite right... letting $x=0$ in the first equation gives $0=4$? Could be a typo, should be $-2$ instead of $+2$. –  Antonio Vargas Apr 6 '12 at 1:49
    
It didn't occur to me to check the first equation. I knew something was fishy. I am convinced that it is a typo. Thanks. –  echoone Apr 6 '12 at 2:10

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

As noted, you probably need to have a $-2$ instead of $+2$, as you can see by setting $x=0$.

But the reason I am adding this answer is that, strictly speaking, there are an infinite number of such $f$!

For instance, given one such $f$ (which you found by differentiating) you can pick any point, and change the value of $f$ to be arbitrary without affecting the value of the integrals.

One can in fact show that if $f$ and $g$ are two such function, then they differ only on a set of measure $0$.

This we can show using two theorems:

1) A bounded function $f$ is Riemann integrable iff the set of discontinuities of $f$ is of measure $0$.

2) If $f$ is Lebesgue integrable on $[a,b]$ and $F(x) = \int_{0}^{x} f $ (Lebesgue integral, which is also the Riemann integral in this case), and if $f$ is continuous at $x_0$, then $F$ is differentiable at $x_0$ and $F'(x_0) = f(x)$.

share|improve this answer
    
You are absolutely right. Thank you for pointing this out. –  echoone Apr 6 '12 at 2:22
    
This is a volterra integral equation right? –  Keaton Apr 6 '12 at 3:37
    
@Keaton: No idea. –  Aryabhata Apr 6 '12 at 4:04
    
I only say because you can solve for eigenfunctuons and values which can be of use depending on what you want out of this. –  Keaton Apr 6 '12 at 4:10
1  
@Keaton: If you regard it as a volterra integral equation, then you will have a trivial kernel. –  Jack Apr 6 '12 at 5:59

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.