Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

In wikipedia, it has been written that an important 2-dimensional example of Ricci flow over $M=\mathbb{R}^2$ is given by $g((x,y),t)=\frac{dx^2+dy^2}{e^{4t}+x^2+y^2} \;\;\; (\star) $

Here are my questions;

I. Why the family $(\star)$ satisfies the Ricci flow equation, i.e. $g'(t)=-2\text{Ric}(t)$ for some $t \in I=[0,T),$ where $\text{Ric}$ is the Ricci tensor?

What I have found:

Using the traditional notations, we have $\partial_tg_{11}=\frac{-4e^{4t}}{ (e^{4t}+x^2+y^2)^2}$ which should be equal to $-2R_{11}.$ We know that, $R_{11}:=R_{1212}+R_{1111}=R_{1212}.$ So, we’re left to show that

$$R_{1212}= \frac{2e^{4t}}{ (e^{4t}+x^2+y^2)^2}$$

By definition, $R_{1212}=<R(X_1,X_2)X_1,X_2>_{g(t)}=\frac{ <R(X_1,X_2)X_1,X_2>_{\delta}}{(e^{4t}+x^2+y^2)^2}$ where $X_1:=\frac{\partial}{\partial x}$ and $X_2:=\frac{ \partial}{\partial y}$ and $<.,.>_{\delta}$ is the Euclidean metric. I cannot proceed from here!

II. Does there exist a family of smooth diffeomorphisms $\phi_t : \mathbb{R}^2 \to \mathbb{R}^2$ s.t. for any $t \in I,$ we have $g(t)=\phi^{\star}_t(g(0))$ i.e. for any $t\geq 0$ the Riemannian manifold $(\mathbb{R}^2, g(t))$ is isometric to $(\mathbb{R}^2, g(0))?$

What I have found:

We have that $g(o)=\frac{dx^2+dy^2}{1+x^2+y^2}. $ Now, $\phi^{\star}_t(g(0))(u,v)=\frac{<d \phi_t (u), d \phi_t (v)>_{\delta}}{1+x^2+y^2}$ and it must coincide with $g(t)(u,v)=\frac{<u,v>_{\delta}}{e^{4t}+x^2+y^2}$ for $u,v \in T_{(x,y)} \mathbb{R}^2.$ How can I find $\phi_t$ explicitly from here?

share|cite|improve this question
Seems no one is interested! – Ehsan M. Kermani Apr 10 '12 at 1:07
Related Phys.SE question: – Qmechanic Oct 9 '14 at 21:17
up vote 10 down vote accepted

I. You can use the Christoffel symbols of the metric to compute the Ricci tensor. The Christoffel symbols $\Gamma^\alpha_{\phantom{\alpha}\beta\gamma}$ are defined by $$\Gamma^\alpha_{\phantom{\alpha}\beta\gamma} = \frac{1}{2}g^{\alpha\rho}(\partial_\gamma g_{\rho\beta} + \partial_\beta g_{\rho\gamma} - \partial_\rho g_{\beta\gamma}),$$ where we are using the Einstein summation convention. You can compute that the Christoffel symbols of $g(t)$ are $$\Gamma^x_{\phantom{x}xx} = \Gamma^y_{\phantom{y}xy} = \Gamma^y_{\phantom{y}{yx}} = - \frac{x}{e^{4t} + x^2 + y^2},$$ $$\Gamma^y_{\phantom{y}yy} = \Gamma^x_{\phantom{x}xy} = \Gamma^x_{\phantom{x}{yx}} = - \frac{y}{e^{4t} + x^2 + y^2},$$ $$\Gamma^x_{\phantom{x}yy} = \frac{x}{e^{4t} + x^2 + y^2},$$ and $$\Gamma^y_{\phantom{y}xx} = \frac{y}{e^{4t} + x^2 + y^2}.$$

In terms of the Christoffel symbols, the Ricci tensor has components $$\mathrm{Ric}_{\alpha\beta} = \partial_\rho \Gamma^\rho_{\phantom{\rho}\beta\alpha} - \partial_\beta \Gamma^\rho_{\phantom{\rho}\rho\alpha} + \Gamma^\rho_{\phantom{\rho}\rho\lambda} \Gamma^\lambda_{\phantom{\lambda}\beta\alpha} - \Gamma^\rho_{\phantom{\rho}\beta\lambda} \Gamma^\lambda_{\phantom{\lambda}\rho\alpha}.$$ Using this and the Christoffel symbols for $g(t)$ above, we have that the Ricci tensor for $g(t)$ is $$\mathrm{Ric}(t) = \frac{2e^{4t}}{(e^{4t} + x^2 + y^2)^2} (dx^2 + dy^2).$$ On the other hand, $$g'((x,y),t) = - \frac{4e^{4t}}{(e^{4t} + x^2 + y^2)^2} (dx^2 + dy^2).$$ Hence $g(t)$ satisfies the Ricci flow equation $$g'(t) = -2 \mathrm{Ric}(t),$$ as desired.

II. Yes, the flow $$\varphi_t: \mathbb{R}^2 \longrightarrow \mathbb{R}^2,$$ $$\varphi_t(x,y) = (e^{-2t}x, e^{-2t}y)$$ satisfies $$g(t) = \varphi_t^\ast g(0).$$

share|cite|improve this answer
Do you have any references to recommend? – Neal Apr 10 '12 at 19:32
@Henry T. Horton: Thank you for your solution. Could you show me, how you came up with the flow for the second part, explicitly? – Ehsan M. Kermani Apr 10 '12 at 23:23
@Neal: For more background on the calculations I outlined, see chapter 3 of Jost's Riemannian Geometry and Geometric Analysis, for example. Physics books are also nice for details on the computational side of Riemannian Geometry: see section 3.4 of Wald's General Relativity for information on various techniques for computing curvature. – Henry T. Horton Apr 11 '12 at 2:32
@ehsanmo: I didn't use any special techniques. Simply note that $g((e^{-2t}x,e^{-2t}y),t) = g((x,y),0)$, so $\varphi_t(x,y) = (e^{-2t}x,e^{-2t}y)$ is the desired isometry. – Henry T. Horton Apr 11 '12 at 2:33

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.