Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

At university we are given a voluntary hand in in the use of maple/matlab, in that regard I have a double integral I am in dire need to compute, using first cartesian then polarcoordinates.

I need to find

$$ \iint_R f(x,y)\,\mathrm{d}A $$

Where R is the region below the curve $y = 3 + \sqrt{9-x^2} \, |x|<3$ and above the line $y = x/3 + 2$, and $ \displaystyle f(x,y) = \frac{x}{\sqrt{x^2+y^2\,}\,\,}$.

After making a nice drawing, i thought the integral could be expressed like this

$$ \int_{-3}^{3} \int_{x/3 + 2}^{3 + \sqrt{9-x^2}} f(x,y)\,\mathrm{d}y\,\mathrm{d}x \approx -2.01$$

Is this correct? Now I also need to compute this double integral using polarcoordinates Firstly I thought the circle could be express as

$$y = 3 + \sqrt{9 - x^2} \ , \ |x| \quad \Leftrightarrow \quad r_2 = 6 \sin \theta \ , \, \pi/4 < \theta < 3\pi/4$$

and the line could be expressed as

$$y = x/3 + 2 \quad \Leftrightarrow \quad r_1 = \frac{6}{3 \sin \theta - \cos \theta}$$

Which finally give me the following integral in polar coordinates:

$$\int_{\pi/4}^{3\pi/4} \int_{r_1}^{r_2} f(x,y) r \, \mathrm{d}r \, \mathrm{d}\theta \, \approx \, 17.28$$

But this is wrong, I think it is due to my angles,how can I compute the double integral in a propper way using both cartesian and polar coordinates? I appreaciate all help =)

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

Not a bad problem on computer-assisted multivariable integration.

  1. Since $f(-x,y)=f(x,y)$, we can ignore parts of the domain that are symmetric about the $y$-axis. For example, the integral could just as well be $$\int_{-3}^{3} \int_{x/3 + 2}^{3 } f(x,y)\,\mathrm{d}y\,\mathrm{d}x $$ without $+\sqrt{9-x^2}$ in the upper limit. This does not change it fundamentally, though: we still need a numeric integration routine to arrive at $\approx -2.01$ (which is correct). And for the polar coordinates it's probably better to keep the semicircular shape as is.

  2. The polar integral that you set up evaluates to $$\int_{\pi/4}^{3\pi/4} \int_{r_1}^{r_2} r \cos\theta \, \mathrm{d}r \, \mathrm{d}\theta \approx -0.81$$ which is not the number you gave.

  3. But the discrepancy between 1 and 2 remains, why? Because the polar integral does not include a triangular bit of $R$ in the bottom left corner. This is the triangle between $x=-3$, $y=x/2+3$, and $\theta=3\pi/4$. In polar terms, this piece contributes $$\int_{3\pi/4}^{\pi-\arctan (1/3)} \int_{r_1}^{-3/\cos\theta} r \cos\theta \, \mathrm{d}r \, \mathrm{d}\theta \approx -1.20$$ which reconciles the computations.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.