9
$\begingroup$

If $X$ is a locally compact and metrizable space such that its Alexandroff compactification is not first countable. Does this imply that no other compactification of $X$ can be first countable? Why?

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ The only extra info on $X$ you have is that it is not separable. Any metrizable $X$ has a metrizable compactification iff it is separable (for $X$ locally compact the Aleksandrov one will do, non-separable spaces will have others). So the question comes down to: does a non-separable metrizable space have a first countable compactification? $\endgroup$ Dec 3, 2010 at 20:19

1 Answer 1

6
$\begingroup$

There can be locally-compact metrizable spaces with non-first-countable Alexandroff compactifications but with other first-countable compactifications.

This follows from a theorem of Banakh and Leiderman in "Uniform Eberlein compactifications of metrizable spaces" which states that a metrizable space $X$ has a first-countable uniform Eberlein compactification if and only if $|X|\leq\mathfrak{c}$.

This implies that the discrete space on $\omega_1$ (which is trivially locally-compact and metrizable) has a first-countable compactification. But the Alexandroff compactification is not first-countable, since the open subsets of the "point at infinity" consist of all co-finite subsets of $\omega_1$ and any (sub-)basis must be uncountable.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.