Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am trying to prove an equivalence between two norms in the Sobolev space $H^1(\Omega)$ over a bounded Lipschitz domain $\Omega$, namely the standard norm $$||u||_{H^1(\Omega)}^2=\int_{\Omega} u^2 \,dx + \int_{\Omega} |\nabla u|^2\,dx$$ and the norm $$||u||_{\partial}^2= \int_{\partial \Omega} u_{|\partial \Omega}^2 \,d\sigma + \int_{\Omega} |\nabla u|^2\,dx$$

The second sumands are the same in both cases, so since in the first one we integrate the positve function $u^2$ over a larger domain, it is clear that $||u||_{\partial} \leq ||u||_{H^1(\Omega)}$, so it now suffices to find a positive constant $C$ such that $C||u||_{H^1(\Omega)}\leq ||u||_{\partial}$.

Now we can use the following projection theorem: given a Hilbert space $H$ and a closed subspace $V\subset H$, for every $X\in H$ there exists a unique $P_Vx\in V$ such that $$||x-P_vx||=\inf_{v\in V} \{||v-x||\}$$ and besides $x-P_Vx\in V^{\perp}$.

In our case, this yields a decomposition $$u=u_0+E(u_{|\partial \Omega})$$ where $E(u_{|\partial \Omega})$ is an extension to $\Omega$ of the restriction $u_{|\partial \Omega}$ and $u_0\in H_0^1(\Omega)$ and therefore $$||u||_{H^1(\Omega)}^2=||u_0||_{H^1(\Omega)}^2+||E(u_{|\partial \Omega})||_{H^1(\Omega)}^2$$

Note that by the projection theorem we have that $$||E(u_{|\partial \Omega})||_{H^1(\Omega)}^2=\inf\{||v||_{H^1(\Omega)}: v\in H^1(\Omega), v_{|\partial \Omega}=u_{|\partial \Omega}\} \stackrel{def}{=} ||u_{|\partial \Omega}||_{H^{1/2}(\partial \Omega)}$$ Does this lead towards our purpose?

Thanks in advance for any insight.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

First, the argument you used to get $\| u\|_\partial \leq \| u\|_{H^1}$ is wrong: $\partial\Omega$ is of (n-dimensional) Lebesgue measure zero so you're implying that $\int_{\partial \Omega} u^2 =0$ which is clearly not (necessarily) true. What you want to say here is that the trace map $u\mapsto u|_{\partial \Omega} = :g(u)$ is a bounded linear operator.

Now to prove the reverse inequality, assume it's not true, then we can find a sequence $\| u_k\|_{H^1} =1$ and $ \| u_k\|_{\partial} <\frac{1}{k}$. This implies that $\| \nabla u_k\|_{L^2} \to 0$, moreover, by Rellich we have an $u$ such that (you'll have a subsequence here) $u_k\to u$ in $L^2(\Omega)$ then $u_k \to u$ in $H^1$, $u\in H^1$ and is locally constant. Then $\| g(u)\|_{L^2(\partial \Omega)} = \lim \| g(u_k)\|_{L^2(\partial \Omega)}=0$, and so $u=0$ a contradiction.

Notice that actually, if $\Omega$ is connected, you can take any $\Gamma \subset \partial \Omega$ of positive measure in the definition of $\| \cdot \|_{\partial}$ and still get an equivalent norm.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.