Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Hello all this is my first math question, I hope this is the right place to post. Anyway, this is basic stuff but I'm a bit confused here, here's the problem's legend: "Find the equation of the plane that passes through the intersection line ($l$) of the planes $2x-y-z=2, x+y-3z+4=0$ and has a distance of 2 from the origin.

Ok, So here's what I've done, the family of planes that pases through $l$ is $$2x-y-z-2+k(x+y-3z+4)=0$$ We work the equation so it looks more like a planes general form: $$Ax+By+Cz+D=0$$ giving us this:$$(2+k)x+(k-1)y+(-3k-1)z +2(2k-1)=$$ where$$A=(2+k)$$ $$B=(k-1)$$ $$C=(-1-3k)$$ $$D=2(2k-1)$$

The problem states that it's distance to the origin is 2 and the normal form of a plane($x\cos{\alpha}+y\cos{\beta}+z\cos{\gamma}-p=0$) where $p$ is the distance of the plane to the origin. We know that to transform a planes equation from the general form to the normal form we must divide each term by $$r=\pm \sqrt{A^2+B^2+C^2}$$ So $p=\frac{D}{r}$ and we have this:$$2=\frac{2(2k-1)}{\pm \sqrt{(2+k)^2+(k-1)^2+(-1-3k)^2}}$$ And here is where my doubt is, what sign should $r$ have positive or negative, the following theorem says:

  • if $D \neq 0$, $r$ is opposite sign of $D$
  • if $D=0$ and $C \neq 0$ $r$ is equal sign of $C$
  • if $D=0$ and $C=0$ and $B \neq 0$ $r$ is equal sign of $B$
  • if $D=0$ and $C=0$ and $B=0$ and $A \neq 0$ $r$ is equal sign of $A$
  • Since we don't know the value of k and $D(k)=2(2k-1)$ and to have $D$ we must find k but k is determined by the sign of D(what a mess hehe) how do we chose $r$'s sign?

    Any help is really appreciated.

    share|improve this question
        
    I don't see how you got your values of $A$, $B$, $C$, and $D$. I get $(1+k)x + (k-1)y +(-3-k)z + (4k-2) = 0$, or $A=1+k$, $B=k-1$, $C=-3-k$, and $D=4k-2$. Even taking your values as true, your $B$ and $C$ are incorrect (should be the negative of what you have) –  Arturo Magidin Dec 2 '10 at 6:49
        
    Okay, that explains $A$; you still your equation wrong, though; the equation has the sign of $B$ wrong, and your expression for $C$ has the wrong sign. –  Arturo Magidin Dec 2 '10 at 7:03
    2  
    Welcome! and +1 for showing the work you did. –  Aryabhata Dec 2 '10 at 7:04
        
    @Moron thank you for the welcome. –  Triztian Dec 2 '10 at 7:10
        
    @Arturo Magidin Yeah, corrected again the equation, sorry, it was a bit awkward writing in Tex, I hope I don't have any errors now, thank you for your patience. –  Triztian Dec 2 '10 at 7:12

    3 Answers 3

    First of all, your equation should be $$(k+1)x+(k-1)y-\cdots.$$

    Note that the distance formula is $$2=\frac{|2(2k-1)|}{\cdots}$$ (no $\pm$). Square both sides (note that square of $|\text{anything}|$ is $\text{anything}^2$, then solve a quadratic equation. You will get two $k$'s. Substitute back to see which one is correct. In this case, it turns out that both $k$'s are correct.

    share|improve this answer
        
    why no $\pm$ sign, the process of transforming from the general form to the normal form involves dividing by $r=\pm \sqrt{A^2+B^2+C^2}$, thats how we know that $$2=\frac{2(2k-1)}{\pm \sqrt{A^2+B^2+C^2}}$$ and the sign of $r$ is determined by the theorem I mention. –  Triztian Dec 2 '10 at 7:21
    1  
    $$2=\frac{|2(2k-1)|}{\sqrt{A^2+B^2+C^2}}$$ is better than $$2=\frac{2(2k-1)}{\pm \sqrt{A^2+B^2+C^2}}$$ since the latter one is misleading; distance cannot be negative. –  TCL Dec 2 '10 at 14:11

    Correct me if I'm wrong here, but if two planes are not co-planar (and these are not), then the intersection between the plane will form a single line. That line will be whatever distance it happens to be from the origin. I'm assuming that by distance from origin, they mean closest point from origin to the line. But anyways, that distance from the line seems just extra.

    Then again, I'm probably missing the point here. All I can think of when seeing this problem is forming normals for the 2 planes and forming the cross product of those vectors to get the intersecting vector. Been doing computer graphics for too long :)

    share|improve this answer
        
    You are completely right, but in this case the distance of the single line to the origin doesn't matter because the line is just used a as reference to find the equation of the plane that we're looking for, if I had the line's distance to the origin I still wouldn't be able to calculate the director numbers $[A,B,C]$ of the plane. –  Triztian Dec 2 '10 at 6:36

    The adoption the + or – is essential in writing the equations of resultant planes (there are two in total) explicitly when other situations with different conditions given. The decision of using which sign is exactly like what you have mentioned.

    However, in this case, the sign is implicitly controlled by ‘k’ and the required equations ‘come out automatically without the necessity of considering the + / – sign’. See below.

    Following your (and also corrections from others) work, we have

    $ 1=\frac{|(2k-1)|}{|±\sqrt{A^2+B^2+C^2}|}$

    $|±\sqrt{A^2+B^2+C^2}| = |(2k-1)|$

    $A^2+B^2+C^2 = (2k-1)^2$

    i.e. $1 + 2k + k^2 + k^2 – 2k + 1 + 9 + 6k + k^2 = 4k^2 – 4k + 1$

    :

    $k = 10.9xxx$ or $–0.9xxxxx$

    Plug these values in correspondingly, you will get 2 sets of A, B, C, D and hence two equations for the two resultant planes meeting your requirement. This is the beauty of analytic geometry.

    The following is an 2-D analogue of the said situation:-enter image description here

    share|improve this answer

    Your Answer

     
    discard

    By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

    Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.