Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Can someone explain why the following works please?

$\int^t_0 f(s) \int^s_0 f(u) \,du\,ds = \int^t_0 f(s) \int^t_s f(u) \,du\,ds $

EDIT: All I know is that $f(x)$ is an integrable function.

This is to do with non-homogeneous Poisson process and $f(x)$ is the intensity function (it's actually $\lambda(t)$ in the notes)

share|improve this question
    
edited my post to clear things up –  user1066113 Apr 1 '12 at 12:24
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 1 down vote accepted

Consider the domains $D=\{(u,s)\mid0\leqslant u\leqslant s\leqslant t\}$ and $D'=\{(u,s)\mid0\leqslant s\leqslant u\leqslant t\}$ and the function $g:(u,s)\mapsto f(u)f(s)$. Then, the LHS is the integral of $g$ on $D$ and the RHS is the integral of $g$ on $D'$. Since $D'$ is the image of $D$ by the symmetry $\tau:(u,s)\mapsto (s,u)$ and since the function $g$ is invariant by $\tau$, both sides coincide.

Edit To convert the LHS and the RHS of the equation in your post into integrals of $g$ on well chosen domains, a systematic way to proceed is to convert every integral $\displaystyle\int_a^b\varphi(x)\mathrm dx$ into $\displaystyle\int [a\leqslant x\leqslant b]\varphi(x)\mathrm dx$, where $[\ \ ]$ denotes the Iverson bracket. For example, the LHS becomes $$ \int [0\leqslant s\leqslant t]f(s)\int[0\leqslant u\leqslant s]f(u)\mathrm du\mathrm ds, $$ that is, $$ \iint[0\leqslant s\leqslant t]f(s)[0\leqslant u\leqslant s]f(u)\mathrm du\mathrm ds=\iint[0\leqslant u\leqslant s\leqslant t]g(u,s)\mathrm du\mathrm ds. $$ By definition of the domain $D$, this is $$ \iint_D g(u,s)\mathrm du\mathrm ds. $$ Likewise, this procedure shows the RHS is $$ \iint_{D'} g(u,s)\mathrm du\mathrm ds. $$ For other simplifications that this write-everything-down-as-indicator-functions technique allows, see there.

share|improve this answer
    
That makes a lot of sense. Thank you. What I'd like to understand more of is, why integral of g = LHS. Is that just how you integrate a function with 2 variables? So if you had something like g:(u,s) -> f(u/s)f(u+s). What would the integration look like? Which part of g would go under which integral? –  user1066113 Apr 1 '12 at 12:41
    
See Edit. $ $ $ $ –  Did Apr 1 '12 at 13:00
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.