Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In a summative assessment, I lost a mark due to this:

$$f_X(x)=\frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^\infty y^2\exp\left\{-\left(\frac{1}{2}+\lambda x\right)y^2\right\} \; dy$$

Now let $a=\frac{1}{2}+\lambda x$ for brevity and $u=ay^2$ so $du=2ay \; du$

Then

$$f_X(x)=\frac{2\lambda}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_0^\infty \frac{u}{a} e^{-u} \; du.$$

The comment was "show that you have considered any possible change in limits", and "y=" and "u=" were inserted into my script, so that it now reads:

$$f_X(x)=\frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{y=-\infty}^{y=\infty} y^2\exp\left\{-\left(\frac{1}{2}+\lambda x\right)y^2\right\} \; dy$$

Then

$$f_X(x)=\frac{2\lambda}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{u=0}^{u=\infty}\frac{u}{a} e^{-u} \; du.$$

This is not a calculus module (it's statistical theory, final year undergraduate), and I feel pretty hard done by ! Is this overly pedantic on the part of the marker ?

EDIT, rather than correct the typos in this post, which would obscure robjohn's answer, I have posted an answer which (hopefully) doesn't contain any typos and makes the point more clearly.

share|improve this question
2  
What I would complain about is that you wrote $\exp-(1/2 +\lambda x)y^2$ while, as is it seems, you wanted to write $\exp(-(1/2 +\lambda x)y^2)$. I would not change your mark because of this, though. –  user20266 Mar 31 '12 at 11:55
    
@Thomas, sorry, yes, a stupid typo. Please see my "answer" below. –  P Sellaz Apr 1 '12 at 9:58
2  
@PSellaz: I think you should speak with your instructor and/or the marker. They are setting the marking scheme for this class, and you need to have a better sense of their expectations than you have. Our opinions here are not terribly relevant. (I haven't looked at your specific work, so this is far from an answer.) –  Sam Lisi Apr 1 '12 at 11:48
    
Please: Don't write \text{exp}. Write \exp. The latter not only prevents italicization, but provides proper spacing before and after "exp", thus: $a\exp b$. \exp is a standard operator name. –  Michael Hardy Apr 1 '12 at 17:22

3 Answers 3

up vote 3 down vote accepted

Your marker was not suggesting that you should write the $y=$ and $u=$ signs on the integrals (I like to do that myself, but there's no reason you should as it's perfectly clear from the $d y$ and the $du$ that those are the variables being integrated over). Rather, (s)he was trying to point out that you should have inserted an extra step noting explicitly that $y=\infty$ corresponds to $u=\infty$ and that $y=-\infty$ corresponds to $u=0$ - considering that this is an undergraduate course, I don't really see why you should have put this in since it seems perfectly clear and you did put the right limits into the integrals, so I would feel a little hard done by as well.

share|improve this answer
1  
Thanks. I agree that it's quite a useful thing to do, to avoid making errors with the limits. In fact I might take up the habit of doing it, for this very reason ! Writing a line to explain the new limits seems reasonable but hardly /essential/ in a module like this. Another reason I think the marking is pointlessly strict is that I can't recall this has never been mentioned in a lecture, nor is it done anywhere in the lecture notes. –  P Sellaz Mar 31 '12 at 11:57
    
Yes - it does seem pointlessly strict. You might want to think about showing the script to your lecturer or someone, just in case there's some other reason you lost that mark. –  Donkey_2009 Mar 31 '12 at 12:10
    
In light of the above, should I delete this answer now? –  Donkey_2009 Mar 31 '12 at 20:24
    
No, the answer is fine. Thanks. Although I made a couple of typos in my post, the point was still the y= and u= –  P Sellaz Mar 31 '12 at 21:07

This is not pedantic! The marker is trying to point out where you went wrong.

I will assume that your integral is actually $$ \frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^\infty y^2e^{-(1/2+\lambda x)y^2}\mathrm{d}y\tag{1} $$ First of all, if $u=ay^2$ and $y=-\infty$, it would seem that $u=\infty$, not $0$.

Secondly, if you are going to use $u=ay^2$, you should break up the integral into pieces that will have disjoint domains. Note that under $u=ay^2$ both $(-\infty,0]$ and $[0,\infty)$ get mapped to $[0,\infty)$. To prevent confusion, the integral should first be broken up into $$ \small \frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^\infty y^2e^{-(1/2+\lambda x)y^2}\mathrm{d}y =\frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^0 y^2e^{-(1/2+\lambda x)y^2}\mathrm{d}y +\frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_0^\infty y^2e^{-(1/2+\lambda x)y^2}\mathrm{d}y\tag{2} $$ One might then notice that since $y^2e^{-(1/2+\lambda x)y^2}$ is even, the two integrals on the right in $(2)$ are equal, therefore $$ \frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^\infty y^2e^{-(1/2+\lambda x)y^2}\mathrm{d}y =\frac{2\lambda}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_0^\infty y^2e^{-(1/2+\lambda x)y^2}\mathrm{d}y\tag{3} $$ Finally, we can apply $u=ay^2$: $$ \begin{align} \frac{2\lambda}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_0^\infty y^2e^{-(1/2+\lambda x)y^2}\mathrm{d}y &=\frac{2\lambda}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_0^\infty\frac{u}{a}e^{-u}\frac{\mathrm{d}u}{2ay}\\ &=\frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_0^\infty\frac{u}{a}e^{-u}\frac{\mathrm{d}u}{\sqrt{au}}\tag{4} \end{align} $$ Note the correct translation of $\mathrm{d}y$. Therefore, the substitution should yield $$ \frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^\infty y^2e^{-(1/2+\lambda x)y^2}\mathrm{d}y =\frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_0^\infty\frac{u}{a}e^{-u}\frac{\mathrm{d}u}{\sqrt{au}}\tag{5} $$

share|improve this answer
1  
This is the correct $f_X(x)=c/(\lambda x+\frac12)^{3/2}$. Note that $f_X$ is integrable at $+\infty$, as it should as the density of a random variable (while the OP's suggestion $f_X(x)=c/(\lambda x+\frac12)$ is not). –  Did Mar 31 '12 at 12:36
    
The lower limit went to 0 in my script because of symmetry (note the factor of 2 outside the 2nd integral). I did forget the $1/\sqrt{au}$ in my post (it was correct in my script. I just forgot it in the posting above). So, I got correct answer. I just lost a mark regarding the y= and the u= . –  P Sellaz Mar 31 '12 at 17:08
    
[sigh] Sorry, yes, the original integral in my OP is wrong as it should be $\frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^\infty y^2 \text{exp}(-(1/2+\lambda x)y^2)\mathrm{d}y\tag{1}$ –  P Sellaz Mar 31 '12 at 17:25

FWIW, this is my complete answer to the question:

$$f_X(x)=\frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^\infty y^2 \text{exp}(-(1/2+\lambda x)y^2)\mathrm{d}y$$

Let $a=\frac{1}{2}+\lambda x$ for brevity and $u=ay^2$ so $du=2ay \mathrm{ d}y$. Then

$$f_X(x)=\frac{2\lambda}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{u}{a} e^{-u} \frac{\mathrm{d}u}{2\sqrt{au}}$$

using the symmetry of the integrand. So

$$ \begin{align} f_X(x) &= \frac{\lambda a^{-\frac{3}{2}}}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{0}^{\infty}u^{\frac{3}{2}-1}e^u \mathrm{d}u\\ &= \frac{\lambda a^{-\frac{3}{2}}\Gamma(3/2)}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\\ &= \frac{\lambda}{2 \sqrt{2}(\frac{1}{2}+\lambda x)^{\frac{3}{2}}} \end{align} $$

I got 6 out of 7 marks - with 1 mark deducted for not writing y= and u= in the integration limits, and this is what my OP was about - I'm sorry for the typos in the OP !

share|improve this answer
    
You could always try opening his post for editing and seeing yourself! Otherwise, it's a \$\$ on both sides of an equation to make it appear big and in the centre, and a $\backslash$begin{align} ... $\backslash$end{align} within the two $$s together with an & before each equals sign and a \\ wherever you want to start a new line if you want the equals signs to line up. I've edited your post now so that the formatting is as in @robjohn's answer - if you have further questions, post them on the meta. –  Donkey_2009 Apr 1 '12 at 11:37
    
@Donkey_2009, thank you ! –  P Sellaz Apr 1 '12 at 18:48

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.