Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I've been reading some of the literature on "open quantum systems" and it looks like the following physical interpretations are made:

  • Reversible dynamics of a closed quantum system are represented by a group of automorphisms (of a $C^*$-algebra, von Neumann algebra, or $B(H)$, depending on whom you read)
  • Irreversible (but still deterministic) dynamics of a closed system are represented by a semigroup of endomorphisms
  • The dynamics of an open system (which are non-deterministic, hence also irreversible) are represented by a semigroup of unital completely positive maps.

I'm trying to motivate this interpretation for someone (in this case, me!) with just a basic familiarity with quantum theory. Using the formalism of QM where states are represented by unit vectors in a Hilbert space, the story goes something like this:

  • In the "Schrodinger picture," operators are fixed and states evolve in time. There are two sub-cases: First, a system that starts in a state $| \phi \rangle$ and isn't measured will, at time $t$ later, be in the state $e^{-itH/\hbar} | \phi \rangle$, where $H$ is a self-adjoint operator representing the Hamiltonian of the system. Second, when a system in state $| \phi \rangle$ undergoes a measurement (modeled as an instantaneous process) corresponding to a self-adjoint operator $X$ (pretend it's bounded with discrete spectrum for simplicity), the system will randomly end up in one of the eigenstates $\frac{P_\lambda | \phi \rangle}{\sqrt{\langle \phi | P_\lambda | \phi \rangle}}$, each with probability $\langle \phi | P_\lambda | \phi \rangle$, where $P_\lambda$ denotes projection onto the eigenspace of $X$ for the eigenvalue $\lambda$.
  • In the "Heisenberg picture," states are fixed and operators evolve in time. Corresponding to the first case above, one has the transformation $X \mapsto e^{itH/\hbar} X e^{-itH/\hbar}$, which is an automorphism of $B(H)$; corresponding to the second case above, one applies, with probabilities $\langle \phi | X | \phi \rangle$, one of the transformations $X \mapsto \frac{P_\lambda X P_\lambda}{\langle \phi | P_\lambda | \phi \rangle}$, each of which is a conditional expectation (in particular, a completely positive map) on $B(H)$.

A couple of things I'm stuck on. First, based on the above, it looks like the second case (measurement) corresponds to a random selection among several non-unital CP maps, rather than a single unital CP map. Second, I don't see the motivation for why an irreversible yet deterministic evolution of a closed system would correspond to a non-invertible endomorphism. What am I missing?

share|cite|improve this question
4  
Maybe this is more suitable for the theoretical physics site? – J. M. Mar 28 '12 at 21:26
    
Thanks, I hadn't seen that site! It looks like the density-operator formulation of QM takes care of my first question, but I'm still trying to figure out where endomorphisms come into the picture. Anyway, the question is now at theoreticalphysics.stackexchange.com/questions/1085/… – Dave Gaebler Mar 29 '12 at 16:37

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.