Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm finding in trouble trying to resolve this exercise. I have to calculate the convolution of two signals:

$$y(t)=e^{-kt}u(t)*\frac{\sin\left(\frac{\pi t}{10}\right)}{(\pi t)} $$

where $u(t)$ is Heavside function

well I applied the formula that says that the convolution of this two signal is equal to

$$Y(f)=X(f)W(f)$$

where $X(f)$ is the fourier transform of the first signal and $W(f)$ is the fourier transform of second signal

well fourier transform of $e^{-kt}u(t)$ is $X(f)=\frac{1}{k+j2\pi f}$. I have to make second signal as equals as possible to $\operatorname{sinc}\left(\frac{\pi t}{10}\right)$ so I do this operation: $\frac{\sin\left(\frac{\pi t}{10}\right)}{\left(\frac{\pi t}{10}\right)}{\left(\frac{1}{10}\right)}$. this is equal ${\left(\frac{1}{10}\right)}\operatorname{sinc}\left(\frac{\pi t}{10}\right)$

right or not?

Edit

If something is not clear please advice me

share|improve this question
3  
The convolution is not equal to the product of Fourier transforms. (It can't be, since convolution is a function of time, while the Fourier transform is a function of frequency.) Rather, the convolution is the inverse Fourier transform of the product of Fourier transforms. I haven't checked your FT's, but assuming they're correct, compute their product, then compute the inverse FT of the product. That is the convolution. –  William DeMeo Mar 28 '12 at 21:26
    
I made some corrections, perhaps conceptually relevant: you are not trying to compute "the convolution of $y(t)$" (you don't compute the convolution of one signal), rather $y(t)$ is the convolution of $x(t)$ and $w(t)$ –  leonbloy Jul 4 '12 at 13:09
    
@Mazzy see the edit. –  Seyhmus Güngören Sep 9 '12 at 9:42

3 Answers 3

up vote 1 down vote accepted

I think this question should be solved in the frequency domain. Otherwise it seems difficult (at least to me).

$$e^{-kt}u(t)\rightarrow^F\frac{1}{k+jw}$$ and $$\frac{w_b}{\pi}sinc(wbt)\rightarrow^F rect(\frac{w}{2w_b})$$ and this in your case $w_b=\frac{\pi}{10}$

As a result we have $$Y(w)=X(w)W(w)=\frac{1}{k+jw}rect(\frac{w}{2w_b})$$ where $rect(\frac{w}{2w_b})=1$ if $|w|<wb$, else $0$. Finally what we need to do is to calculate the inverse fourier transform that is $$y(t)=F^{-1}(Y(w))=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-w_b}^{w_b}\frac{1}{k+jw}e^{jwt}dw.$$ I think this integral should not be a big trouble.

EDIT: We can make a change of variables as $z=k+jw$ and $dz=jdw$. From here we have

$$\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-w_b}^{w_b}\frac{1}{k+jw}e^{jwt}dw=\frac{-j}{2\pi}\int_{-w_b}^{w_b}\frac{1}{z}e^{(z-k)t}dz=\frac{-j}{2\pi}\int_{-w_b}^{w_b}\frac{1}{z}e^{zt}dz\cdot\int_{-w_b}^{w_b}\frac{1}{z}e^{-kt}dz$$ from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_integrals_of_exponential_functions $$\int\frac{ e^{tz}}{z}dz=\ln|z|+\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{(tz)^n}{nn!}$$ and $$\int\frac{1}{z}e^{-kt}dz=\ln|z|e^{-kt}$$ Accordingly we have $$\frac{-j}{2\pi}\left[\ln|z|e^{-kt}\left(\ln|z|+\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{(tz)^n}{nn!}\right)\right]_{-w_b}^{w_b}$$ which is $$\frac{-j}{2\pi}\left(\ln w_be^{-kt}\left(\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{(tw_b)^n}{nn!}-\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{(-tw_b)^n}{nn!}\right)\right)$$

share|improve this answer
    
"I think this integral should not be a big trouble." Could you outline an approach that could be used to evaluate the integral or provide a reference to a table of Fourier transforms where this inverse transform can be found? –  Dilip Sarwate Sep 9 '12 at 2:24
    
@DilipSarwate please see the edit. –  Seyhmus Güngören Sep 9 '12 at 9:39

I think it is better to leave the Fourier transform idea, and use brute force instead.

  1. Write down the integral.

  2. Use the definition of the Heaviside function.

  3. Use a change of variable.

  4. Use Euler formula for $\sin$.

  5. End up with exponential integrals.

share|improve this answer
    
I don't think there's anything wrong with this answer. Hopefully it won't get marked down again...+1 –  daniel Sep 10 '12 at 1:32
    
@daniel Thanks, perhaps the change of variables should be removed though. –  AD. Sep 10 '12 at 17:17

I think William DeMeo's comment is a good answer. You are simply trying to use the table and get your function into a form that can be used.

The second function--call it $f_2$-- is currently $\frac{\sin (\pi t/10)}{\pi t}.$ Multiply it by 10, so you have $$f_3 = 10 \cdot f_2 = 10 \frac{\sin(\pi t/10)}{\pi t}= \frac{\sin(\pi t/10)}{(1/10)\pi t}= \text{sinc}(\pi t/10).$$

Letting $f_1 = e^{-kt}u(t),$ we know that the product of the transforms $F_1$ and $F_3$ pairs with the convolution of the inverses of the functions in the time domain.

So find the Fourier transforms of $f_1,f_3$, multiply those, and find the inverse transform of the product. That will be the convolution $c_1 =f_1*f_3.$ Since $AF(\omega)\leftrightarrow Af(t), c_2 = \frac{c_1}{10}$ is what you want.

share|improve this answer
    
what is the difference of your post then mine except for implicit expressions. –  Seyhmus Güngören Sep 9 '12 at 9:44
    
there is no problem except that you had to refer if there was already a similar post. Your post says Find Fourier transforms of $f_1$ and $f_3$ while there is another post which provides them already (my post before the edit). –  Seyhmus Güngören Sep 10 '12 at 10:37

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.