Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

If $A$ is a linear operator on a normed vector space $X$ and $A^k$ is compact for some positive integer $k$, is it possible that $A$ is unbounded?

If not, how to prove that $A$ is bounded?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 6 down vote accepted

Of course, if $k=1$ then $A$ is bounded. Otherwise, it doesn't need to be true. Let $H$ a separable Hilbert space with $\{e_n\}$ a Hilbert basis and define $$Ae_{kj+l}=\begin{cases} je_{kj+l+1}&\mbox{ if }0\leq l<k-1\\\ 0 &\mbox{ if }l=k-1. \end{cases}$$ We have $A^k=0$ so $A^k$ is compact but $A$ is not bounded.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks! It's a good example. – henryforever14 Mar 27 '12 at 21:02
Hmm, I don't quite agree that $A^k=0$. The closure of $A^k$ is $0$. (But maybe the OP meant to assume that the closure of $A^k$ is compact.) – Hendrik Vogt Mar 28 '12 at 13:52

This is almost the same as Davide's answer:

Let $S:\ell_2\rightarrow\ell_2$ be any unbounded operator. Define $T:\ell_2\oplus_2\ell_2\rightarrow\ell_2\oplus_2\ell_2$ via $T(x,y) = \bigl(0,S(x)\bigr)$. Then $T^k=0$ for any $k>1$ and thus compact, but $T$ is unbounded.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks! It's a nice example. – henryforever14 Mar 27 '12 at 21:02

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.