Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm working through Hoffman's linear algebra book right now for a proof-based class on Linear Algebra and I'm a little confused about some of the calculations regarding linear transformations.

For this question in particular, I am not sure if I have done it correctly or how to do part (c),

Let $T$ be the linear operation on $\mathbb{R}^3$ defined by, $$T(x_{1},x_{2},x_{3})=(3x_{1} + x_{3},-2x_{1} + x_{2}, -x_{1} + 2x_{2} + 4x_{3})$$ $(a)$ What is the matrix of $T$ in the standard ordered basis for $\mathbb{R}^3$?

$(b)$ What is the matrix of $T$ in the ordered basis $\{\alpha_{1},\alpha_{2},\alpha_{3}\}$, where $\alpha_{1}=(1,0,1), \alpha_{2}=(-1,2,1),$ and $\alpha_{3}=(2,1,1)$?

$(c)$ Prove that $T$ is invertible and give a rule for $T^{-1}$ like the one which defines $T$.

For $(a)$, I think you simply compute $T(1,0,0), T(0,1,0)$, and $T(0,0,1)$ and then whatever you get will be the entries in $[T]_{\mathbb{B}}$, where $\mathbb{B}$ denotes the standard basis for $\mathbb{R}^3$. That is,

$$[T]_{\mathbb{B}} =\left[ \begin{array}{ccc} 3 & -2 & -1 \\ 0 & 1 & 2 \\ 1 & 0 & 4 \\ \end{array} \right]$$

Now, for $(b)$ I am pretty sure that you just compute $T(1,0,1), T(-1,2,1),$ and $T(2,1,1)$ to find the matrix of $T$ in the ordered basis $\{\alpha_{1},\alpha_{2},\alpha_{3}\}$. Then, we get for $1 \leq i \leq 3$,

$$[T]_{\mathbb{\alpha_{i}}} =\left[ \begin{array}{ccc} 4 & -2 & 3 \\ -2 & 4 & 9 \\ 7 & -3 & 4 \\ \end{array} \right]$$

Let me know if I have gone wrong so far. My idea for $(c)$ was to invert this matrix and then somehow deduce a rule from there, but I am not sure.

My question is: How can I answer (c)? (and also, if I have done anything wrong thus far let me know).

This is not homework.

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

If your coordinate vectors are row vectors, then $[T]_{\mathbb{B}}$ is correct. Otherwise, it should be transposed. I will continue to work in the world of row vectors (assuming your first matrix is following the conventions of your text)...

Let's call $\mathbb{A}=\{\alpha_1,\alpha_2,\alpha_3\}$. Then $T(\alpha_1)=T(1,0,1)=(4,-2,3)$ etc. and so your second matrix is $[T]_\mathbb{A}^\mathbb{B}$ (this matrix takes vectors in $\mathbb{A}$ coordinates and spits out answers in $\mathbb{B}$ coordinates. So that's not the matrix you want.

Instead, consider $P = [I]_\mathbb{A}^\mathbb{B} = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 1 \\ -1 & 2 & 1 \\ 2 & 1 & 1 \end{bmatrix}$ (we get this by applying the identity map to each element of $\mathbb{A}$ and then writing them in $\mathbb{B}$ coordinates, so for example: $I(1,0,1)=(1,0,1)$ and $[(1,0,1)]_\mathbb{B}=[1\;0\;1]$). This matrix transforms $\mathbb{A}$ coordinate vectors to $\mathbb{B}$-coordinates. For example: $(0,2,2)=(1,0,1)+(-1,2,1)$ so $[(0,2,2)]_\mathbb{A}=[1\;1\;0]$. Notice that $[1\;1\;0]P = [0\;2\;2] = [(0,2,2)]_\mathbb{B}$.

Thus to get $T$ written in $\mathbb{A}$ coordinates, we need to shift from $\mathbb{A}$ to $\mathbb{B}$ coordinates, apply $T$ in $\mathbb{B}$ coordinates, and then shift back.

Therefore, $[T]_\mathbb{A} = P[T]_\mathbb{B}P^{-1}$ (since $P^{-1}=[I]^\mathbb{A}_\mathbb{B}$).

Now to get $T^{-1}$, just compute $([T]_\mathbb{B})^{-1}$ this will be the coordinate matrix of $T^{-1}$ in standard coordinates. To get a formula for $T^{-1}$ reverse the process you went through to get $[T]_\mathbb{B}$ in the first place.

Once you have a formula for $T^{-1}$ you can show that $T^{-1}(T(x_1,x_2,x_3))=(x_1,x_2,x_3)$ and $T(T^{-1}(y_1,y_2,y_3))=(y_1,y_2,y_3)$ thus showing that $T^{-1}$ is in fact the inverse of $T$ (which the notation $T^{-1}$ kind of assumes). Alternatively, one can show that a linear transformation (between finite dimensional vector spaces) is invertible if and only if (any of) its coordinate matrix is invertible which in turn is true iff the determinant of $[T]_\mathbb{B}$ is not zero.

share|improve this answer
    
I just figured out this question and a few other ones that I was struggling with for over an hour. Thank you so much for the help, I really appreciate it! The whole idea of changes in basis and the interplay between a linear transformation and the matrix corresponding to a linear transformation makes complete sense to me now. –  Samuel Reid Mar 25 '12 at 21:26

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.