Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Related to page 819 prob 4 in this book. I am incorrectly calculating the left-hand-side (def. LHS), some newbie error with commutativity probably. Ideas?

Errors?

  1. I propose $(\hat{e}_r\partial_r)\cdot (\hat{e}_r\partial_r)=\partial_r^2$, wrong?

  2. $(\frac{1}{r}\hat{e}_{\theta}\partial_{\theta})\cdot (\frac{1}{r}\hat{e}_{\theta}\partial_{\theta})=\frac{1}{r^2}\partial_\theta^2$, wrong?

LHS=?

$$(\hat{e}_{r}\partial_{r} + \frac{1}{r}\hat{e}_{\theta}\partial_{\theta}) \cdot (\hat{e}_{r}\partial_{r} + \frac{1}{r}\hat{e}_{\theta}\partial_{\theta}) =\partial_{r}\partial_{r}+\frac{1}{r^2}\partial_{\theta}\partial_{\theta}$$

The error is probably in the premise about commutativity, could someone indicate what is going totally wrong here?

Right-hand-side=A+B

$$\partial_{r}(r\partial_{r})=1\partial_{r}+r\partial_{r}^2$$

so

$$\begin{cases} A &=\frac{1}{r}\partial_{r}(r\partial_{r})=\frac{1}{r}\partial_{r}+\partial_{r}^2 \\ B &=\frac{1}{r^2}\partial_\theta^2.\end{cases}$$

share|cite|improve this question
    
Have you tried applying the formulas for $\hat{e}_R$, $\hat{e}_\theta$, and $\hat{e}_\phi$ from my answer to your other question? – robjohn Mar 25 '12 at 2:54
    
@robjohn: gathered issues here, to clarify things -- I have to solve the sub-problems before going into the major probs. – hhh Mar 25 '12 at 10:56
up vote 1 down vote accepted

The basis itself is a function of $\theta$.

Equations 1 and 2 are fine, but there is a cross term in the dot product you're interested in.
To work this out you should first convince yourself that $$\begin{eqnarray} \partial_r \hat e_r &=& 0, \\ \partial_r \hat e_\theta &=& 0, \\ \partial_\theta \hat e_r &=& \hat e_\theta \\ \partial_\theta \hat e_\theta &=& -\hat e_r. \end{eqnarray}$$ The cross term comes from $(\frac{1}{r} \hat e_\theta)\cdot [(\partial_\theta \hat e_r)\partial_r] = \frac{1}{r}\partial_r$.

Let's look at this in more detail. First notice that $\hat{e}_{r}\partial_{r} + \frac{1}{r}\hat{e}_{\theta}\partial_{\theta}$ is the del operator in polar coordinates. Thus, you are trying to find the Laplacian in polar coordinates.

FOIL out the expression $$\left(\hat{e}_{r}\partial_{r} + \frac{1}{r}\hat{e}_{\theta}\partial_{\theta}\right) \cdot \left(\hat{e}_{r}\partial_{r} + \frac{1}{r}\hat{e}_{\theta}\partial_{\theta}\right).$$ You will find four terms, $$\begin{eqnarray} \left(\hat{e}_{r}\partial_{r}\right) \cdot \left(\hat{e}_{r}\partial_{r}\right) &=& \partial_r^2 \\ \left(\hat{e}_{r}\partial_{r}\right) \cdot \left( \frac{1}{r}\hat{e}_{\theta}\partial_{\theta}\right) &=& 0 \\ \left(\frac{1}{r}\hat{e}_{\theta}\partial_{\theta}\right) \cdot \left(\hat{e}_{r}\partial_{r}\right) &=& \frac{1}{r} \partial_r \\ \left(\frac{1}{r}\hat{e}_{\theta}\partial_{\theta}\right) \cdot \left(\frac{1}{r}\hat{e}_{\theta}\partial_{\theta}\right) &=& \frac{1}{r^2}\partial_\theta^2. \end{eqnarray}$$ The first and fourth terms are the ones you have claimed. But there is a subtlety. For example, $$\begin{eqnarray} \left(\frac{1}{r}\hat{e}_{\theta} \partial_{\theta}\right) \cdot \left(\frac{1}{r}\hat{e}_{\theta} \partial_{\theta}\right) &=& \left(\frac{1}{r}\hat{e}_{\theta}\right)\cdot \left( \frac{1}{r} \hat{e}_{\theta} \partial_{\theta}^2 + \frac{1}{r} (\partial_\theta \hat e_\theta) \partial_\theta \right) \\ &=& \left(\frac{1}{r}\hat{e}_{\theta}\right)\cdot \left( \frac{1}{r} \hat{e}_{\theta} \partial_{\theta}^2 - \frac{1}{r} \hat e_r \partial_\theta \right) \\ &=& \frac{1}{r^2} \partial_\theta^2, \end{eqnarray}$$ since $\hat e_\theta\cdot \hat e_r = 0$. Notice that $$\partial_\theta (\hat{e}_{\theta} \partial_{\theta}) = \hat e_\theta \partial_\theta^2 + (\partial_\theta \hat e_\theta)\partial_\theta$$ by product rule of differentiation.

Being similarly careful with the other terms you will find the claimed result, $$\left(\hat{e}_{r}\partial_{r} + \frac{1}{r}\hat{e}_{\theta}\partial_{\theta}\right)^2 = \partial_r^2 + \frac{1}{r} \partial_r + \frac{1}{r^2} \partial_\theta^2.$$

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.