Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm trying to understand a certain formula for the determinant in a more general setting.

Say you have a free module $M$ of rank $n$ over a (commutative) ring $R$. Let $\phi\in\operatorname{End}(M)$, the $R$-module of $M$ endomorphisms, and denote by $c_i$ the trace of $\phi$ in the exterior algebra $\Lambda^i M$ (a.k.a alternating algebra, grassman algebra).

How come $$ \det(\phi-x\text{id})=\sum_{i=0}^n (-1)^ic_ix^i? $$

This seems like it would follow easily from induction, but unless I'm missing something obvious, I don't see how the trace fits in. Can someone explain why this polynomial identity is true? Many thanks.

share|cite|improve this question
You want to assume that $M$ is free. Then this is a polynomial identity which can be derived by standard methods from the case that $R$ is a field. But then linear algebra comes to the rescue ... – Martin Brandenburg Mar 24 '12 at 21:34
Thanks @MartinBrandenburg. Do you have a reference for this identity when $R$ is a field so I can attempt to adapt it? I couldn't find one. – Hailie Mathieson Mar 25 '12 at 18:15
@hmIII: try to work this out for the $2 \times 2$ case first. Write out the characteristic polynomial as a function of the matrix entries and you will obtain the trace and the determinant of $\phi$ as the coefficients. Now, just notice that determinant comes from the action of $\phi$ on the top exterior power (this holds for any $n$). If this makes sense, you should be able to generalize to other $\Lambda^i$ without too much trouble. – Marek Mar 25 '12 at 19:42
For the induction step: Laplace expansion on the first column and recall that $\wedge^i \phi:\wedge^i M \rightarrow \wedge^i M$ is given by $i\times i$ minors – Blah Mar 25 '12 at 20:50
Thanks, I'll give it a go. – Hailie Mathieson Mar 26 '12 at 13:32
up vote 10 down vote accepted

If $M$ is a module over $R$, any endomorphism $\phi:M\to M$ induces an endomorphism $\Lambda^r \phi:\Lambda^rM\to \Lambda^rM$.
If $M$ is free with basis $e_1,...,e_n$, then $\phi $ has a matrix $A=(a_{ij})$ in this basis.
The module $ \Lambda^rM$ is also free, with basis $(e_H)_{H\in\mathcal H}$ where $\mathcal H$ is the set of strictly increasing sequences $H=(1\leq i_1\lt ...\lt i_r\leq n)$ and $e_H=e_{i_1}\wedge ...\wedge e_{i_r}$.

The key point is that with respect to this basis the linear mapping $\Lambda^r \phi$ has a matrix $\Lambda^r A=B= (b_{H,K})$ and that the entries $b_{H,K}$ can be computed:
the result is $b_{H,K}=\operatorname { det } (A_{H,K})$, the minor obtained by extracting from $A$ the lines numbered by $H$ and the columns numbered by $K$.
Hence we have the formula at the heart of the answer to your question $$\operatorname { Tr }(\Lambda^r \phi) =\sum_H b_{H,H}=\sum_H \operatorname { det }(A_{H,H})$$ From this follows the required formula for the characteristic polynomial of $\phi$ $$ \chi_\phi(X)= \operatorname { det } ( X\cdot 1_n-A)=\sum_{r=0}^n (-1)^r (\sum_H \operatorname { det }(A_{H,H}))X^{n-r} =\sum_{r=0}^n (-1)^r \operatorname { Tr }(\Lambda ^r\phi) X^{n-r} $$

The formula $b_{H,K}=det (A_{H,K})$ giving the matrix of of the exterior product of an endomorphism is very useful, in the study of Plücker embeddings and Grassmannians for example, and is a modern avatar of the venerable Laplace expansion of determinants.
It is, in my opinon, underappreciated and the very notion of exterior power $\Lambda^r A$ of a matrix $ A$ is very rarely mentioned.
[Amusingly the notion of tensor product of matrices, aka Kronecker product, seems to have made a comeback thanks to quantum computation and quantum information]

share|cite|improve this answer
Thank you Georges, I appreciate your ever elegant answers! – Hailie Mathieson Apr 5 '12 at 19:03
I really value these kind words, @hmIII: thank you very much. – Georges Elencwajg Apr 5 '12 at 19:50

This business about working over a commutative ring $R$ is a red herring. Ultimately this is a collection of $n$ polynomial identities in $n^2$ variables $x_{ij}$ over the integers; that is, it suffices to prove this identity over $\mathbb{Z}[x_{ij}]$ as an equality of integer polynomials. But two integer polynomials are equal abstractly if and only if they're equal, say, when the $x_{ij}$ are set to arbitrary complex numbers. So it actually suffices to prove the identity over a specific algebraically closed field of characteristic zero such as $\mathbb{C}$ to prove it in general.

At this point you can take any proof you like that works over $\mathbb{C}$. Here's one:

  • The identity is obvious for diagonal matrices. Since the identity is conjugation-invariant, it follows for all diagonalizable matrices.
  • The diagonalizable matrices are dense and polynomials are continuous (alternately: the diagonalizable matrices are Zariski-dense and polynomials are Zariski-continuous), so the identity is true for all matrices.

You didn't just ask for a proof, though: you asked for an explanation. I addressed this question in another math.SE answer. Briefly, one can think of the RHS of your identity as the "trace," in an appropriate sense, of the action of a linear transformation on the exterior algebra, and then the result follows for diagonalizable matrices by an observation about how the exterior algebra functor behaves on direct sums.

share|cite|improve this answer
Many thanks Qiaochu, the linked question is helpful as well. – Hailie Mathieson Apr 5 '12 at 19:04

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.