Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

In the comments on this question, Robert Israel proved that the order of an element in $GL_2(\mathbb{Z})$ can be $2,3$ or $6$ (or infinite). This result is remarkedly reminiscent of the crystallographic restriction theorem, but I can't seem to find the relation. Is this mere coincidence, or is there something deep buried here?

share|cite|improve this question
This fact is used in the only prof I've ever seen of the CRT, so yes, there is a connection. – Alex Becker Mar 19 '12 at 22:52
In the wiki article there are four proofs, but I don't see this fact appearing in none of them. What is the proof you are referring to? – yohBS Mar 19 '12 at 22:58
It's from Modern Algebra: An Introduction by John Durbin if I remember correctly. I'm afraid I don't have the book on hand. – Alex Becker Mar 19 '12 at 22:59
Don't forget $1$ and $4$. – Robert Israel Mar 19 '12 at 23:09
They, of course, follow triviałly. – yohBS Mar 20 '12 at 5:55
up vote 1 down vote accepted

The connection is that any lattice in $\mathbb{R}^2$ is isomorphic to $\mathbb{Z}^2$, so any (linear) group of symmetries of a lattice injects into $\text{GL}_2(\mathbb{Z})$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks. One has also to add two lines about why it is also valid for lattices in $\mathbb{R}^3$, but it's fairly easy. – yohBS Mar 20 '12 at 8:58

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.