Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

A function $f(x)$ is defined $\forall x \in \mathbb{Q}$ and $ x \in (0,1)$ as $f(x) = q $ where $x = (p/q)$ in simplest form. Find $\sup_{\tau} \quad \min_{a} \quad f(a) + f(\tau-a)$ where $ a \in \mathbb{Q}$ and $ a \in (0,1)$ and $ \tau \in (\alpha,\beta)$ where $ 0< \alpha < \beta <2 $ and $ \alpha,\beta \in \mathbb{Q} $. $\sup$ and $\min$ are taken over only those $x$ where $f(x)$ is defined. Is the supremum infinity ?

EDIT

The supremum may or may not depend on $\alpha$ and $\beta$...this has not been ruled out.


EDIT 2

I will try something !

Consider $\tau = l/m$ where $l,m \in \mathbb{N}$ in simplest form and $\tau \in \mathbb{Q}\cap(0,2)$.

what is minimum possible value of $q$ where $\tau-a = p/q $ written in simplest form such that $a \in \mathbb{Q} \cap (0,1)$ and $(\tau-a) \in (0,1)$.

As Yuval Filmus suggested in his answer...

one way to choose $a$ is that it has same denominator (in simplest form) as that of $\tau$ and numerator $n$ such that $l-n$ is relatively prime to $m$, (If such a choice is possible under given conditions), then $f(a)+f(\tau-a)$ becomes $2m$.

The question is whether such a choice leading to $f(a)+f(\tau-a) = 2m$ is the minimum possible value ? If not I request you to give a counter example.

If it is, then the supremum (over $\tau$ varying in any arbitrary open interval contained in $(0,2)$) is $\infty$ as we can increase $m$ arbitrarily by varying $\tau$ in any arbitrary open interval $(\alpha,\beta)$.

EDIT 3

small change in Question...instead of $0<\alpha<\beta<2$ we have $-1<\alpha<\beta<1$

this change is not made with any intention of bringing out a certain solution.Also its influence on the solution is hoped to be very small.Inconvenience is regretted.

share|improve this question
1  
For questions like this, it is nice to give some indication of what you have tried so far and where you got stuck. –  Rahul Nov 28 '10 at 5:17
    
Even though i have formulated the question...every time i attempt to solve I get lost and tend to move away from the actual question. I find it hard to get hold of anything in it ! –  Rajesh D Nov 28 '10 at 11:29
    
I badly need some help atleast to get started somewhere –  Rajesh D Nov 28 '10 at 11:30

2 Answers 2

up vote 2 down vote accepted

EDIT: This is a consolidated solution which previously appeared in parts.

Lemma 1. For each natural $M$ and real $\alpha < \beta$ there's a rational number in $(\alpha,\beta)$ whose reduced form has a denominator larger than $M$.

Proof. Choose some power of two $2^n > \max\left(M, \frac{2}{\beta-\alpha}\right)$. Since $2^{-n} < \frac{\beta-\alpha}{2}$, there are at least two fractions of the form $x/2^n$ in $(\alpha,\beta)$. One of them has odd $x$ and so is in reduced form.

Lemma 2. If $p_1/q_1 + p_2/q_2 = P/Q$, all rationals in reduced form, then $(q_1+q_2)^2 \geq 4Q$.

Proof. Taking a common denominator, $\frac{p_1 q_2 + p_2 q_1}{q_1q_2} = \frac{P}{Q}$ and so $Q|q_1q_2$ (since $P/Q$ is reduced). In particular $Q \leq q_1q_2 \leq \left(\frac{q_1+q_2}{2}\right)^2$, where the last inequality is the arithmetic-geometric mean inequality.

Theorem. For every real $M$ and reals $\alpha < \beta$ there is a rational $r \in (\alpha,\beta)$ such that $\min_{a \in \mathbb{Q}} f(a) + f(r-a) > M$.

Proof. Using lemma 1, take a rational $r \in (\alpha,\beta)$ with denominator $Q > M^2/4$. Using lemma 2, we conclude that for every rational $a$, $f(a) + f(r-a) \geq 2\sqrt{Q} = M$.

Corollary. $$\sup_r \min_a f(a) + f(r-a) = \infty.$$

share|improve this answer
    
@Yuval Filmus: ....what is B ? a natural number ? why is q1+q2 being considered here ? –  Rajesh D Nov 28 '10 at 5:29
    
@Yuval Filmus: $P = 1$ and $Q = q_1q_2$ ?? please confirm –  Rajesh D Nov 28 '10 at 5:48
    
@Yuval Filmus: using the property that when $p,q$ are relatively prime then there exist $x,y \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $px+qy = 1$. –  Rajesh D Nov 28 '10 at 5:52
    
@Yuval Filmus: I am not able to make out how it leads me to answer the question. –  Rajesh D Nov 28 '10 at 5:57
    
B is a real number, it corresponds to the supremum. –  Yuval Filmus Nov 28 '10 at 6:38

For a given $\tau=\frac{1}{q}, q$ prime it seems that $a$ should be (perhaps among other choices) $\frac{\tau}{2}$ with $\sup_{\tau} \quad \min_{a} \quad f(a) + f(\tau-a)=2q$. Can you prove this? If so, then the sup over $\tau$ is infinity as you can find $\tau$ with arbitrarily large denominator.

share|improve this answer
    
the supremum is over $\tau$ varying in any arbitrary open interval contained in (-1,1). It should be proven for every arbitrary open interval contained in (-1,1). Hence the assumption that the numerator of $\tau$ (in simplest form) being equal to $1$ may not cover all possibilities. –  Rajesh D Nov 28 '10 at 17:50
    
You are right. I think the same argument can be made for any $\tau=\frac{p}{q}$ with $q$ prime. The frightening thing is for $\frac{1}{n(n+1)}$, where $\frac{1}{n}$ and $\frac{1}{n+1}$ work for a sum of 2n+1. Even that goes to infinity with $\tau$, but only as the square root. –  Ross Millikan Nov 28 '10 at 22:00

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.