Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am trying to show that near $x = 0$ the series $u_1(x) +u_2(x) +u_3(x)+\dots$, where $u_1(x) = x$, and $u_n(x) = x^{\left(2n-1\right) ^{-1}}-x^{\left( 2n-3\right) ^{-1}}$, and real values of $x$ are concerned , is discontinuous and non uniformly convergent.

Now of course the necessary condition for uniformity of convergence is that. If $R_{n,p}\left( x\right) = u_{n+1}\left( x\right) +u_{n+2}\left( x\right)+\dots+ u_{n+p}\left( x\right)$ given any positive number $\epsilon$, it should be possible tp choose $N$ independent of x(but depending on $\epsilon$ such that $$\left|R_{n,p}(x)\right|<\epsilon $$ for all positive integral values of $p$. $$\left| S\left( x\right) -S_{n}\left( x\right) \right| = \left| \lim _{p\rightarrow \infty }R_{n,p}\left( x\right) -R_{N,n-N}\left( x\right) \right| < \epsilon $$ whenever $n>N$ and N is independent of x.

I was hoping to show that given an arbitrarily small $\epsilon$, it is possible to choose values of $x$, as small as we please, depending on $n$ in such a way that $\left|R_{n}(x)\right| $ is not less than $\epsilon$ for any value of $n$, no matter how large. The existence of such values of $x$ is inconsistent with the condition for uniformity of convergence, though i am having a a hard time finding a $S_n(x)$ and $R_n(x)$. would this be a valid argument ?

Any help or alternative proof strategies would be much appreciated.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

Note that $$ \sum\limits_{i=2}^n(x^{\frac{1}{2i-1}}-x^{\frac{1}{2i-3}})= \sum\limits_{i=2}^n x^{\frac{1}{2i-1}}- \sum\limits_{i=2}^n x^{\frac{1}{2i-3}}= \sum\limits_{i=2}^n x^{\frac{1}{2i-1}}- \sum\limits_{i=1}^{n-1} x^{\frac{1}{2i-1}}= $$ $$ \left(\sum\limits_{i=2}^{n-1} x^{\frac{1}{2i-1}}+x^{\frac{1}{2n-1}}\right)- \left(x^{\frac{1}{1}}+\sum\limits_{i=2}^{n-1} x^{\frac{1}{2i-1}}\right)= x^{\frac{1}{2n-1}}-x $$ Hence $$ x+\sum\limits_{i=2}^n(x^{\frac{1}{2i-1}}-x^{\frac{1}{2i-3}})=x^{\frac{1}{2n-1}} $$ It is remains to notice that $$ S(0)=\sum\limits_{i=1}^\infty u(0)=\lim\limits_{n\to\infty} 0^{\frac{1}{2n-1}}=0 $$ $$ S(x)=\sum\limits_{i=1}^\infty u(x)=\lim\limits_{n\to\infty} x^{\frac{1}{2n-1}}=1\qquad 0<x\leq 1 $$ i.e. $S$ is not continuous, because $$ \lim\limits_{x\to 0+} S(x)\neq S(0) $$ Our series consist of continuous functions. If it converges uniformly then $S(x)$ must be continuous too. Contradiction.

share|cite|improve this answer
thanks for trying to help though. – Comic Book Guy Mar 17 '12 at 0:11
thanks buddy. u r a clever cookie. – Comic Book Guy Mar 17 '12 at 2:04

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.