Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

EDIT: Don't think about this. The problem statement is flawed. (See comments)

Let $K$ be a field, and let $K(T)$ be the quotient field of polynomials over $K$.

Then I define $v(f/g) = \deg(f) - \deg(g)$ if $f/g\neq 0$ and $v(0) = \infty$. I need to show that this is a discrete valuation.

The properties needed:

(i) $v(f/g) = \infty$ if and only if $f/g = 0$.

(ii) $v\Bigl((f/g)\cdot (p/q)\Bigr) = v(f/g) + f(p/q)$

(iii) $v\Bigl((f/g) + (p/q)\Bigr) \geq \min(v(f/g),v(p/q))$

The first two properties were easy, but I run into the following difficulty with the 3rd. Assume wlog that $v(f/g)\leq v(p/q)$.

I have $v\Bigl((f/g) + (p/q)\Bigr) = v\Bigl((fq + pg)/gq\Bigr) = \deg(fq + pg) - \deg(gq)$.

I somehow need to get $\deg(fq + pg) \geq \deg(fq)$, and then I can finish the chain to get what I want.

I feel like the following argument "almost" works.

Since $\deg(f/g)\leq \deg(p/q)$, then I think that $\deg(fq)\leq \deg(pg)$.

If the latter inequality were strict, then I would KNOW that (1) $\deg(fq)\leq \deg(fq + pg)$.

But if equality holds, I don't know how to deal with something like the following possibility.

$f(x)q(x) = x^2 - 1$, $p(x)g(x) = -x^2$, then this violates $(1)$.

share|cite|improve this question
As you note: if $\frac{f}{g} = \frac{1+t}{t}$ and $\frac{p}{q} = \frac{1-t}{t}$, then $v(f/g)=v(p/q) = 0$, and $\frac{f}{g}+\frac{p}{q} = \frac{1+t}{t}+\frac{1-t}{t} = \frac{2}{t}$, so $v((f/g)+(p/q))=-1$, which is not greater than or equal to $0$. So something is wrong. I think the standard valuation on this ring is $v(f)-v(g)$, where $v(f)$ is the largest power of $t$ that divides $f$ (i.e., multiplicity of the root $0$); in that situation, both $(1+t)/t$ and $(1-t)/t$ would have valuation $-1$. – Arturo Magidin Mar 16 '12 at 21:44
So I guess the question is: are you sure you got the right definition of $v$? – Arturo Magidin Mar 16 '12 at 21:53
Yes this is how $v$ was defined in the problem. But as you pointed it out it doesn't work. Thanks for saving me an awful lot of time! I'll ask my professor about it. – roo Mar 16 '12 at 21:58
Note: I should have mentioned that the notation for the discrete valuation is $v_{\infty}$. That may help determine if the valuation is the one you mentioned or not. This is important since it is heavily used in a later problem, which is probably also incorrect unless the mapping is changed accordingly. – roo Mar 16 '12 at 22:16
The infinite valuation on $K(T)$ is given by $v_\infty(\frac{p}{q}) = \deg q - \deg p$. – Brandon Carter Mar 16 '12 at 22:29
up vote 3 down vote accepted

0) It is to your credit that you couldn't prove iii) because it is false! Indeed
$ v((x^2)+(x-x^2))\geq \operatorname {min}(v(x^2),v(x-x^2)) \;$ is equivalent to $1 \geq \operatorname {min}(2,2)$

1) So $v$ is not a valuation. The correct definition of the valuation is

$$w(f/g)=\operatorname {deg} g-\operatorname {deg} f \; \text {for} \; f\neq 0 \quad (\text {and} \;w(0)=\infty)$$

Of course it can't hurt to realize that $w$ just computes the order of vanishing of fractions at infinity . For example $w( \frac {T^3-1}{T^7+T^2+1})=4$

2) The proofs of i) and ii) are trivial and in iii) you may reduce (by taking a common denominator) to the case of non zero fractions $\frac {f}{g}, \frac {F}{g}$ .
You then have to show that:

$w( \frac {f+F}{g})= \operatorname {deg}(g)-\operatorname {deg} (f+F)\stackrel {?}{\geq} \operatorname {min}(w(\frac {f}{g}),(w(\frac {F}{g}))=\operatorname {min}(\operatorname {deg}g -\operatorname {deg}f,\operatorname {deg}g -\operatorname {deg}F)$

which boils down to the obvious $\operatorname {deg}(f+F)\leq \operatorname {max}(\operatorname {deg}(f),\operatorname {deg}(F)) $

share|cite|improve this answer
thanks very much for this! – roo Mar 16 '12 at 22:33

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.