Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Zariski-Samuel define an unmixed/equidimensional ideal to be one whose associated primes have the same dimension. At other places I have seen definitions saying unmixed=all associated primes have same height equidimensional==all associated primes have same dimension

Are these two definitions equivalent?

share|cite|improve this question

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.