Tell me more ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

How do we show that For $x,y \ge 0$ real numbers, there exists a constant C suchthat: $$\pi(x+y)-\pi(y) \le \frac{1}{3}x+C$$ Where $\pi(.)$ denotes thes prime counting function, is true?

the hint is to sieve n with $y< n \le x+y $:

$$\pi (x+y) \le 1+ \sum _{n \le x+y} 1+1-1 - \sum_{2|n}1 - \sum_{3|n}1 + \sum_{6|n}1 + \sum_{n\le x+y} 1 = $$ $$1+ \sum _{n \le x+y} 1+1-1 - \sum_{2|n}1 - \sum_{3|n}1 + \sum_{6|n}1 + [x+y]$$

because: $1\le n = dm \le x+y \Leftrightarrow \frac{1}{d}\le m \le \frac{x+y}{y} $

so: $$\sum_{n\le x+y , d|n}1 = [\frac{x+y}{d}]$$

then that gives: $$\pi (x+y) < 1+ [x+y] - [\frac{x+y}{2}] - [\frac{x+y}{3}] + [\frac{x+y}{6}]$$

so that will give: $\pi (x+y) < \frac{x+y}{3} + 3$ but also we get : $\pi(y) < \frac{y}{3} + 3$ so for any constant $C\ge 0$ it will surely hold that:

$$\pi(x+y) - \pi(y) < \frac{x}{3} \le \frac{x}{3} + C$$

Is this correct?

share|improve this question
1  
There is $ \leq 1/3 \pi(x)$ in the title, but $\leq 1/3 x$ in the post. – dtldarek Mar 14 '12 at 23:15
Thanks for the correction dtldarek. – VVV Mar 14 '12 at 23:18
Hint: Which numbers modulo $6$ can be prime? – TMM Mar 14 '12 at 23:22
1  
What if you forget about the $C$ for a moment and bring $\Delta y$ to the LHS. With $\Delta y \to 0$ you get: $$ \lim_{\Delta y\to 0} \frac{\pi(y+\Delta y)-\pi(y)}{\Delta y}=\pi(y)'\le 1/3. $$ Now use $\pi(y)\approx \frac{y}{\log y}$ and therefore $\pi(y)'\approx \frac{\log y-1}{(\log y)^2}=\frac{1}{\log y}-\frac{1}{(\log y)^2}$ which has a global maximum of $1/4$ at $y=e^2$. See here. – draks ... Mar 15 '12 at 14:31
1  
Thank you. The prime number theorem wasnt proven yet, so the only thing that comes in question is the sieve of eratosthenes (as TMM suggests, sieving n numbers in the interval of $y<n\le x+y$ but it looks like I did it wrong (I believe). – VVV Mar 15 '12 at 15:53
show 4 more comments

3 Answers

Hint: Which numbers modulo $6$ can be prime? (Certainly not those divisible by $2$ or $3\ldots$)

So on an interval of width $x$ from $y$ to $y + x$, how many primes ($\pi(y+x) - \pi(y)$) do we expect at most on this interval?

share|improve this answer
I put my comment to your answer in the edit of my question, thanks. – VVV Mar 15 '12 at 10:33

You are asking us to show that your inequality holds for any $x, y \ge 0$ and for any constant $C$, which is obviously false. Perhaps this is what you mean:

Show that there exists a constant $C$ such that for any real numbers $x, y \ge 0$, $\pi(x+y)-\pi(y) \le \frac{1}{3}x+C$.

share|improve this answer
Yea, exactly TonyK. – VVV Mar 15 '12 at 22:52
@VVV: Still not right, I'm afraid: now your statement is vacuously true. I suppose that's an improvement! – TonyK Mar 16 '12 at 8:34

Let me elaborate on my earlier hint. The idea is that you look at numbers modulo $6 = 2 \cdot 3$ and see which of them can be prime. For example, if $n \geq 5$, then:

  • If $n \equiv 0 \bmod 6$ then $n = 6k = 2 \cdot 3 \cdot k$ is never prime.
  • If $n \equiv 2 \bmod 6$ then $n = 6k + 2 = 2 \cdot (3k + 1)$ is never prime.
  • If $n \equiv 3 \bmod 6$ then $n = 6k + 3 = 3 \cdot (2k + 1)$ is never prime.
  • If $n \equiv 4 \bmod 6$ then $n = 6k + 4 = 2 \cdot (3k + 2)$ is never prime.

So if $n \geq 5$, then the only possible cases for which $n$ can be prime are $n \equiv 1,5 \bmod 6$. Since those are two of the six congruence classes, only $2/6 = 1/3$ of all numbers on some interval $[y, y + x]$ belong to either of these classes and could potentially be prime. The constant $C$ is just there for those annoying cases like $y = 1$ and $x = 6$, but $C = 2$ should do.

Note that the fraction $2/6$ is actually $\phi(6)/6$ in disguise (where $\phi$ is Euler's totient function, counting the numbers less than $n$ that are coprime to $n$), and by looking at congruence classes modulo any fixed $n$ you can prove that for all $x,y$,

$$\pi(y + x) - \pi(y) \leq \frac{\phi(n)}{n} x + C,$$

where $C \leq n$ is constant when $n$ is fixed and $x,y$ are variable. Since

$$\inf_{n \in \mathbb{N}} \ \frac{\phi(n)}{n} = 0,$$

the primes become sparser and sparser as $x$ increases, and $\pi(y + x) - \pi(y) = o(x)$ grows slower than any linear function in $x$. In other words, if you replace the $\frac{1}{3}$ in the problem by any other positive fraction, the statement is still true.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.