Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Or is there a particularly canonical homeomorphism between $S^n\subset \mathbb{R} ^{n+1}$ and $SS^{n-1}$ (the reduced suspension)? Right now the only thing that comes to mind is to think of the sets $\{t\}\times S^{n-1}, 0 \leq t \leq 1$ in $SS^{n-1}$ as corresponding to the sets $p^{-1}(K)$ where K is a hyperplane in $\mathbb{R}^n$ and $p$ is stereographic projection $S^n\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^n$ from the north pole of $S^n$ (as the $t$ parameter moves from $0$ to $1$ the $K$ sweep out $R^n$ through parallel hyperplanes).

share|improve this question
add comment

4 Answers

up vote 4 down vote accepted

The reduced suspension $S S^{n-1}$ can be represented in $\mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ as the union of two cones on $S^{n-1} \subset \mathbb{R}^{n}\times\{0\},$ one with vertex at $(0,\ldots,0,1),$ and one with vertex at $(0,\ldots,0,-1).$

To get an explicit homeomorphism from this to $S^{n},$ you need not use stereographic projection; instead, just divide every point of $S S^{n-1}$ (each of which is a vector) by its norm.

EDIT: Since you're thinking about the reduced suspension, which I'll call $\Sigma S^{n-1},$ then your identification is probably the best one. You'll end up with a parabolic pencil of $(n-1)$-spheres about the north pole.

share|improve this answer
    
Thank you. I'm a little confused because, if I understand everything correctly, you're talking about the suspension but not the reduced suspension. –  Tim kinsella Mar 13 '12 at 19:19
    
Oh, gosh, you're right! –  Robert Haraway Mar 13 '12 at 19:25
add comment

I think there is a very nice way to see this. But it requires to redefine what the n-sphere should be. So in what follows let $S^n$ denote the one-point compactification of $\mathbb{R}^n$, which is linked to the usual definition via the stereographic projeciton (for example when working in symmetric spectra this approach is very useful since the $\Sigma_n$ just acts by permuting coordinates of $\mathbb{R}^n$ and fixing the point at infinity).

But in this description you can compute explicitely that the identification $\mathbb{R}\times \mathbb{R}^{n-1} \cong \mathbb{R}^n$ induces a homeomorphism $S^1 \wedge S^{n-1} \to S^n$ on the one-point compactifications.

share|improve this answer
add comment

It is convenient to think of this in terms of the smash product $X \# Y$ of two spaces with base point. This is the space $X\times Y$ with $X \vee Y= X \times * \cup * \times Y$ shrunk to a point. Then the reduced suspension of $X$ is really $X \# S^1$. The general result is that

$$S^m \# S^n \cong S^ {m+n}.$$

One way of seeing this is to say that if $S^m$ has the cell structure $e^0 \cup e^m$, and similarly $S^n$, then $S^m \times S^n$ has the cell structure

$$e^0 \cup e^m \cup e^n \cup e^{m+n}, $$ and the first three cells determine $S^m \vee S^n$. So when you form the smash product $\ldots$

Here is a figure illustrating $S^1 \# S^1$ from Topology and Groupoids.

Fig. 5.9

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks Ronnie. This is extremely helpful. –  Tim kinsella May 19 '12 at 20:36
add comment

It is not hard to see that the unreduced suspension is homeomorphic to sphere, so you have to show that the result of collapsing a (standardly embedded) segment in a sphere is still a sphere.

Can you see what the result of collapsing one of the edges of a cube is?

share|improve this answer
1  
hmmm. its easy for me to see in low dimensions. I will have to think a bit more. Thank you for your help. –  Tim kinsella Mar 13 '12 at 19:29
    
Just to clarify: I'm confident I can show that the two spaces are homeomorphic; I was just wondering if there's a particularly natural, standard or enlightening homeomorphism. (Yours is probably all those :) –  Tim kinsella Mar 13 '12 at 19:52
    
It might help to think of the CW-complex structure, particularly because you can have many different ones! –  John Stalfos Apr 12 '12 at 15:09
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.