Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am looking for an alternate proof of the fact that in a commutative ring $R$ with a prime ideal $P$, the ideal $P^{(n)}=P^n R_P\cap R$ is primary. I understand once we localize, $P^n R_P$ is a power of the maximal ideal in $R_P$ and hence primary and hence the contraction to $R$ is primary.

How would one prove this by first principles i.e. using the definition of primary ideals? Suppose $xy\in P^{(n)}$. Then there exists $t\notin P$ such that $txy\in P^n$. How do I show either $x\in P^{(n)}$ or $y\in P$?

share|improve this question
The notation is confusing me. Do you just want the symbolic power $P^{(n)} = (P^nR_P) \cap R$? –  Dylan Moreland Mar 13 '12 at 5:01
@DylanMoreland: Sorry I somehow missed the $n$ which made the notation confusing and in the second instance I had just copy pasted from the first. –  Wayne S Mar 13 '12 at 5:03
Dear Wayne, You are trying to show $x \in P^{(n)}$ or $y \in P$ (not $x \in P^n$ or $y \in P$). So suppose that $y\not\in P,$ and consider the statement $txy \in P^n$. Can you see how to conclude that $x \in P^{(n)}$? Regards, –  Matt E Mar 13 '12 at 5:46
@Matt E: Sorry for another typo. But yes that's what I was trying. $y\notin P$ gets me $tx\in P$. Can't seem to do better than that. I would like to get $tx\in P^n$, but don't see how. –  Wayne S Mar 13 '12 at 5:50
@Matt E: Ah, I see it. $ty \notin P$, so $(ty)x\in P^n$ gets $x\in P^{(n)}$. –  Wayne S Mar 13 '12 at 5:51
show 2 more comments

Know someone who can answer? Share a link to this question via email, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook.

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.