Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am trying to evaluate

$$\int \frac{5-e^{x}}{e^{2x}} \mathrm dx$$

I tried rewriting the integral by throwing $e^{2x}$ up on top and using $$u=e^{x}$$ $$du = e^{x} dx$$

I then tried another substitution where $v = 5-u$ and $dv = -1 du$ but then I can only simplify the integral to

$$\int \frac{v}{(v-5)^{3}} \mathrm dv$$

Which would then require partial fractions, which my class has not gotten to quite yet (so I'm not allowed to use the method for homework, sadly).

Is there a simple substitution I am overlooking from the beginning or something?

Thanks.

share|improve this question
2  
Your substitution would work, but the approaches discussed in the answers are simpler. For example, let $u=e^x$ as you did. Then your integral becomes $\int \frac{(5-u)}{u^3}\,du$. This is $\int \left(\frac{5}{u^3}-\frac{1}{u^2}\right)du$, which is very doable without partial fractions. –  André Nicolas Mar 13 '12 at 4:39
1  
Ah, I see that now. For some reason my mind wasn't in a mode to split up the integrand into two pieces last night. –  Joe Mar 13 '12 at 21:02

3 Answers 3

up vote 9 down vote accepted

This is (homework), so only hints: $$\begin{eqnarray} \frac{a-b}{c} & = & \frac{a}{c} - \frac{b}{c} \\ \frac{e^{\alpha x}}{e^{\beta x}} & = & ?? \\ \int e^{tx} \ dx & = & ?? \\ \end{eqnarray} $$

share|improve this answer
1  
Ah, wow. I was simply overthinking the problem! Thanks J.D. –  Joe Mar 13 '12 at 4:09
    
Do you have to use the quotient rule in order to finish with this problem? –  Victor Mar 13 '12 at 6:10
    
@Victor: The quotient rule is for differentiation, not integration. The middle equation here tells us that the fractions can be simplified. –  anon Mar 13 '12 at 9:30

Rewrite the integrand $5e^{-2x}+e^{-x}$. You know how to integrate $ae^{bx}$ right?

share|improve this answer
1  
Ah, of course. I glossed over that fact (it's late, that's an excuse, right?) - would much rather keep it simple than double substitutions and partial fractions. Thanks. –  Joe Mar 13 '12 at 4:10

Did you try integrating by parts where $dv = \frac{3}{e^{3x}}$ and $u = 5 - (e^x)$ ? It may be a bit laborious of a calculation,but that's what I'd try if I was instructed NOT to use partial fractions. This is where knowing as many techniques of integration as possible comes in very handy in baby calculus.

share|improve this answer
6  
Cmon! Here's the LaTeX :) $dv = \frac{3}{e^{3x}}$ and $u = 5 - (e^x)$ –  user2468 Mar 13 '12 at 4:27
    
@J.D. That better? –  Mathemagician1234 Mar 13 '12 at 5:12
3  
No, I did not try integrating by parts - my class is just learning antiderivatives of functions involving e, so I figured that method was also implied not to be used, as the class has not learned it. Nonetheless, I see how that would also work. Rewriting the integrand and splitting it up into two integrals seems to be the easiest way from what I could tell though. –  Joe Mar 13 '12 at 21:00
4  
You would really use integration by parts rather than the suggestion in the earlier answers of distributing the division and integrating simple exponentials? –  Jonas Meyer Mar 14 '12 at 3:41
14  
Yes, but it's a terrible way of doing the problem. Not only does it use unnecessarily technology, but the algebra is harder than the elementary solution given above. [moderation edited to remove superfluous insult, M.G.] –  Adam Smith Mar 14 '12 at 6:38

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.