Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have a sequence $X_i$ of random variables which can with probability $1/2$ each, take values $+1$ and $-1$. How do I find $\lim_{n \to \infty} P(\Sigma X_i \le x)$? Pretty obviously the sum has equal masses at $+\infty$ and $- \infty$, but I am not able to write a proof down. Should I use all moments from the characteristic function and use it to describe the cdf?

share|cite|improve this question
I assume that $x$ is fixed. We can either work with the $X_i$ directly, or let $Y_i=(X_i+1)/2$. Then use the Central Limit Theorem. More unpleasant but doable would be to make explicit estimates for probabilities associated with $\sum_1^n Y_i$. – André Nicolas Mar 12 '12 at 18:54
Note that $X_i$ is not a Bernoulli random variable. The variables $Y_i = (X_i + 1)/2$ given by André are. – TMM Mar 12 '12 at 19:08
@AndréNicolas : The central limit theorem won't work here. The central limit theorem will give you $\lim_{n\to\infty} \Pr(\sum_{i=1}^n X_i/\sqrt{n} \le x)$. That $\sqrt{n}$ needs to be there. – Michael Hardy Mar 12 '12 at 20:21
@Michael Hardy: I may have trouble with division. We want the probability that $\overline{X} \le \frac{x}{n}$, so the probability that a standard normal is $\le \frac{cx\sqrt{n}}{n}$, where $c$ is an irrelevant constant. For $n$ large, we are calculating the probability that a standard normal is $\le$ to a nearly $0$ number. – André Nicolas Mar 12 '12 at 20:47
up vote 1 down vote accepted

We assume that $x$ is fixed for the duration of this solution. The first solution is deliberately pretty silly. For no good reason except familiarity, we let $Y_i=(X_i+1)/2$. Then the $Y_i$ are independent Bernoulli Random variables, and $\sum_{1}^n X_i=2\sum_1^n Y_i -n$. We are interested in $P(\sum_1^n x_i \le x)$. This is $$P\left(\sum_1^n Y_i -\frac{n}{2} \le \frac{x}{2}\right).$$ The random variable $\sum_1^n Y_i$ has Binomial distribution.

Divide both sides by $n$. We want $$P\left(\overline{Y} -\frac{1}{2} \le \frac{x}{2n}\right).$$ The random variable $\overline{Y}$ has mean $\frac{1}{2}$ and variance $\frac{1}{4n}$. By the Central Limit Theorem, the probability that $\overline{Y}-\frac{1}{2}$ is $\le y$ is approximately the probability that $Z \le y/\sqrt{1/4n}$, where $Z$ is standard normal.

Putting things together, we find that for $n$ large, the probability that $\overline{Y}-\frac{1}{2}$ is $\le \frac{x}{2n}$ is approximately the probability that $Z\le \frac{2x\sqrt{n}}{2n}$, that is, the probability that $Z\le \frac{x}{\sqrt{n}}$. By approximately we mean that the difference between the two probabilities approaches $0$ as $n\to\infty$.

As $n\to \infty$, the number $\frac{x}{\sqrt{n}}$ approaches $0$, so our probability approaches $\frac{1}{2}$.

Remark: The approach we used was very wasteful. In particular, the $Y_i$ were completely unnecessary! The $X_i$ have mean $0$ and variance $1$, what could be nicer than that? The random variable $\sum_1^n X_i$ has mean $0$ and variance $n$, and therefore standard deviation $\sqrt{n}$. So the probability that $\sum_1^n X_i <x$ is approximately the probability that $Z\le \frac{x}{\sqrt{n}}$. This approaches $\frac{1}{2}$ as $n\to\infty$.
We have deliberately used the Central Limit Theorem imprecisely. That can be replaced by the precise limit version.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks for the answer, Andre! It is simple, except for differing from the usual applications of the CLT where the variance tends to 0. – Bravo Mar 13 '12 at 4:11
@Bravo: Yes, in a certain sense because the variance of the sum is large, and $x$ is (in standard deviation units) is close to $0$, $x$ is virtually at the center of the distribution. The constant $x$ could be replaced by something that does not grow too fast, like $cn^{1/4}$. But $n^{1/2}$ would be too big. – André Nicolas Mar 13 '12 at 4:24

You can also compute directly. Fix $x<0$ and $k$ as the biggest integer not over $x$. $$P(S_n \leq x)=\{1-P(S_n=0)\}\frac{1}{2}-P(S_n=-1)-...-P(S_n=k+1)$$ and note that those probabilities converge to $0$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.