Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Suppose that $f:U\subset\mathbb{C}\to\mathbb{C}$, where $U$ is a region in the complex plane, is a holomorphic function.

If $c\in\mathbb{R}$ is a regular value for $\text{Re}(f(z))$ then it follows from implicit function theorem that $\text{Re}(f(z))^{-1}(c)$ is at least locally a differentiable curve in the plane.


1- If $c$ is a regular value is any connected component of $\text{Re}(f(z))^{-1}(c)$ a global differentiable curve ?

2-If $c$ is not a regular value and $\text{Re}(f(z))^{-1}(c)$ have at least one cluster point is this set locally a curve ?

share|cite|improve this question
What do you mean by "global differentiable curve"? – Jesse Madnick Nov 28 '10 at 5:43

(1) To use your notation, if $c \in \mathbb{R}$ is a regular value, then the level set $Re(f(z))^{-1}(c)$ will be a 1-dimensional embedded submanifold of $U \subset \mathbb{R}^2$. Therefore, every connected component will be a connected 1-manifold.

Now, I'm not sure what exactly you mean by "global differentiable curve."

If you mean "something of the form $f(t) = (x(t), y(t))$," then it follows from the comments in this question that yes, every connected component can be put in that form.

If you mean "something of the form $y = f(x)$ or $x = f(y)$" then the answer is (I think) no. For example, consider $f(z) = \log z$ on $U = R^2 - \{x \geq 0, y = 0\}$, i.e. the plane with the non-negative x-axis deleted. Then $Re(f(z)) = \log(\sqrt{x^2+y^2})$, so the level set $Re(f(z))^{-1}(1)$ is the circle $x^2 + y^2 = e^2$ minus the point $(e,0)$. So, it doesn't seem like you'd be able to represent this curve by a single function $x = f(y)$ or $y = f(x)$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Hi Jesse, I realized after I post that this part (1) of the question it is not hard as you said in the first paragraph. Some time after I post the question here I post it also on Mathoverflow and I got from Bruno Martelli the full answer. The idea is to use the local form of holomorphic functions. I will leave the link in case you want to see the solution : – Leandro Nov 29 '10 at 3:38
Thanks for the answer Jesse. – Leandro Nov 29 '10 at 3:38

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.