Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Solve for $x$: $$ 2^{2x+1} - (17)2^x + 8 = 0 $$

I have the answers: -1, 3

I tried a few different transformations, but couldn't get a clear answer. I suspect that I am overlooking a property of log that would be useful.

Edit: using a u substitution for $2^x$, I was able to factor the quadratic into:


$2^x = 1/2$

$2^x = 8$

$x = -1, 3$

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

Don't bother with log at first. The real question is, what is $2^{2x+1}$ in terms of $2^x$? I.e. if you have the latter, what do you do to it to get the former? That way you can say $u=2^x$ is its own variable, rewrite the equation entirely with $u$, solve for $u$, and then take the base-2 logarithm to find $x$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Note that $2^{2x+1} = 2^{2x}\times 2 = 2\times(2^x)^2$.

So if we let $y=2^x$, then you can rewrite the equation as $$2y^2 - 17y + 8 = 0.$$

This can be solved using the quadratic formula. Once you know the value of $y=2^x$, then you can use logarithms to get the value of $x$. However, applying the logarithm to the whole expression on the left of the equal sign of your original equation will not simplify things.

share|cite|improve this answer
This problem should be closed because $(2y-1)(y-8)=0 \Rightarrow x=-1, 3$ are the solutions. – Kirthi Raman Mar 11 '12 at 22:59
@KirthiRaman: I'm sorry... why does that imply that "the problem should be closed"? – Arturo Magidin Mar 11 '12 at 23:06

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.