Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Can you find mistake in my computation of $H^{k}(S^{n})$.

Sphere is disjoint union of two spaces: $$S^{n} = \mathbb{R}^{n}\sqcup\mathbb{R^{0}},$$ so $$H^{k}(S^n) = H^{k}(\mathbb{R}^{n})\oplus H^{k}(\mathbb{R^{0}}).$$ In particular $$H^{0}(S^{n}) = \mathbb{R}\oplus\mathbb{R}=\mathbb{R}^{2}$$ and $$H^{k}(S^{n}) = 0,~~~k>0.$$

Where is mistake? Thanks a lot!

share|cite|improve this question
You can't space with different dimensions! – checkmath Mar 10 '12 at 1:01
If $S^1$ were really the disjoint union of $R$ and a point $\bullet$ then the identity $S^1 \to S^1$ wouldn't be continuous. ($S^1$ is connected so its image must be connected, but a disjoint union (of non-empty things) is disconnected) – Jacob Bell Mar 10 '12 at 1:16
@donkeykong, well... if $S^1$ were the disjoint union of $\mathbb R$ and a point, then the identity $S^1\to S^1$ would be continuous because all identity maps of all topological spaces are continuous! Your argument is wrong in that if $S^1$ were the disjoint union of $\mathbb R$ and a point then $S^1$ would not be connected! – Mariano Suárez-Alvarez Mar 10 '12 at 3:35
@mariano: yeah, yeah, you got me. I was just (wrongly) putting pressure on the fact that $S^1$ is indeed connected (I should've just said that). thanks for pointing it out. – Jacob Bell Mar 10 '12 at 12:07
up vote 5 down vote accepted

You are wrong: $S^n$ is not the disjoint union $\mathbb R^n \sqcup \mathbb R^0$ - topologically.

Although $S^n$ is $\mathbb R^n$ with one point at infinity, the topology of this point at infinity is very different from that of $\mathbb R^0$.

share|cite|improve this answer
for example, the sphere is connected, but the disjoint union is not. – ziggurism Mar 10 '12 at 1:37

This should be a comment but is too long.

If your reasoning were correct, we could also do the following: write $S^1$ as the "disjoint union" of two open intervals and two points (by cutting out the north and south poles, for example) Then your idea would show that $H^0(S^1)=\mathbb R^4$. And you can cut it in more pieces...

share|cite|improve this answer
Dear Mariano, $H^0$ rather than $H^1$? Cheers, – Matt E Mar 10 '12 at 4:56
Indeed! Thanks for the catch :) – Mariano Suárez-Alvarez Mar 10 '12 at 4:58

de Rham cohomology is not additive, unless you have a partition of the manifold $M$ by two open subsets $U$ and $V$, then the Mayer-Vietoris exact sequence implies that $H^0(M)=H^0(U)\oplus H^0(V)$. Here a point $\{N\}$ is not open in $S^n$. However, the Euler characteristic is additive and $$\chi(S^n)=\chi(\mathbb{R}^n)+\chi(\{N\})=(-1)^n+1.$$

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.