Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Do elements of the absolute Galois group $G=\mathrm{Gal}(\overline{\mathbf{Q}}/\mathbf{Q})$ of $\mathbf{Q}$ induce automorphisms of $\mathbf{C}$ if we extend the morphisms trivially to the rest of $\mathbf{C}$? Here we consider an element of $G$ as an automorphism of $\overline{\mathbf{Q}}\subset \mathbf{C}$ (and we fix this embedding).

Does this define an action on the moduli space of compact connected Riemann surfaces of genus $g$ by pulling back a Riemann surface via this action?

That is, let $\sigma$ be in $G$. Let $X$ be compact connected Riemann surface. Then we can let $\sigma$ act on $X$ algebraically by pulling back $X/\mathrm{Spec} \ \mathbf{C}$ along $\sigma$.

It is clear that $G$ acts on the $\overline{\mathbf{Q}}$-points of the moduli space $M_g$.

share|improve this question
2  
What do you mean by "extend the morphisms trivially to the rest of $\mathbb{C}$"? If $\alpha$ is an algebraic number and an element of $G$ acts trivially on $\pi$ and $\pi - \alpha$, then necessarily it also acts trivially on $\alpha$... –  Qiaochu Yuan Mar 8 '12 at 21:36
    
Anyway, there is an interesting relationship between the absolute Galois group of $\mathbb{Q}$ and moduli of curves, but this isn't how it goes. The relevant keywords are "Belyi's theorem" and "Grothendieck-Teichmuller." –  Qiaochu Yuan Mar 8 '12 at 21:37
    
Ow, so there is actually no "canonical" way to extend a non-trivial element of $G$ to an endomorphism of $\mathbf{C}$... –  seporhau Mar 8 '12 at 21:38
    
I know Belyi's theorem: the set of dessins d'enfants associated to a $\overline{\mathbf{Q}}$-point of $M_g$ is non-empty. What do you mean by Grothendieck-Teichmuller? –  seporhau Mar 8 '12 at 21:40
    
I don't feel particularly qualified to explain, but a Google search will turn up lots of resources. –  Qiaochu Yuan Mar 8 '12 at 21:43

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

Every automorphism of $\overline{\mathbb{Q}}$ extends to an automorphism of $\mathbb{C}$, but in many ways. In fact, one has a short exact sequence

$$1 \rightarrow \operatorname{Aut}(\mathbb{C}/\overline{\mathbb{Q}}) \rightarrow \operatorname{Aut} \mathbb{C} \rightarrow \operatorname{Aut}(\overline{\mathbb{Q}}) \rightarrow 1.$$

The group $K = \operatorname{Aut}(\mathbb{C}/\overline{\mathbb{Q}})$ has cardinality $2^c = 2^{2^{\aleph_0}}$, so is truly enormous. By a theorem of D. Lascar, it is a simple group. I do not know whether the exact sequence splits; if it doesn't, then this would give a very strong sense in which there is no "natural" extension of an automorphism of $\overline{\mathbb{Q}}$ to an automorphism of $\mathbb{C}$.

As you say, the absolute Galois group $\mathfrak{g}_{\mathbb{Q}} = \operatorname{Aut}(\overline{\mathbb{Q}}/\mathbb{Q})$ acts on the $\overline{\mathbb{Q}}$-points of $M_g$,..as is the case for any scheme over $\mathbb{Q}$. It also acts on the $\ell$-adic cohomology groups of $M_g$, which is, via a comparison theorem, reasonably close to saying that it acts on the cohomology of $M_g$ in the usual topological sense.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.