Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

If p , q , r denotes the side of the triangle ,then the below expression will always lies between?

$$\left(\frac{p}{q+r}\right) + \left(\frac{r}{q+p}\right) + \left(\frac{q}{p+r}\right) $$

I tried to solve it by using the property that sum of length of 2 sides of triangle is always greater than 3rd side. So

p+q > r

q+r > p

r+q >p

So the expression should be less than 3.

But the answer in the book is : Range : 1.5 to 2. Thanks in advance.

share|cite|improve this question
Lies between what? – Pedro Tamaroff Mar 8 '12 at 6:52
@PeterT we have to find the range. – vikiiii Mar 8 '12 at 7:11
Is the third term supposed to be $$\frac{q}{p+r}\;?$$ – Brian M. Scott Mar 8 '12 at 7:16
@BrianM.Scott ya.thanks.i have edited the question. – vikiiii Mar 8 '12 at 7:21
Maybe this helps a little – Gerenuk Mar 8 '12 at 11:55
up vote 7 down vote accepted

There are two inequalities to prove. One is quite easy, the other less so.

Let $s$ be the half-perimeter. By the Triangle Inequality, all of $q+r$, $p+r$, and $p+q$ are $> s$. It follows that $$\frac{p}{q+r}+\frac{q}{p+r}+\frac{r}{p+q}<\frac{p}{s}+\frac{q}{s}+\frac{r}{s}=\frac{2s}{s}=2.$$

The other inequality is contest material. It can be derived from various other popular contest inequalities, such as the Rearrangement Inequality, or the Chebyshev Inequality, even AM/GM, even less. This inequality holds for all positive $p$, $q$, and $r$. We give a fairly minimal but tricky proof. Our sum can be written as $$\frac{2p+2q+2r}{2q+2r}+\frac{2p+2q+2r}{2r+2p}+\frac{2p+2q+2r}{2p+2q}-3.$$ This is
$$\frac{1}{2}\left(1+\frac{p+q}{q+r}+\frac{r+p}{q+r}+1+\frac{q+r}{r+p} +\frac{p+q}{r+p}+1+\frac{r+p}{p+q}+\frac{q+r}{p+q}\right)-3.$$ Group terms as shown below: $$\frac{1}{2}\left(3+\left(\frac{p+q}{q+r}+\frac{q+r}{p+q}\right) + \left(\frac{q+r}{r+p}+\frac{r+p}{q+r}\right)+\left(\frac{r+p}{p+q}+\frac{p+q}{r+p}\right)\right)-3.$$ Recall that if $t$ is positive, then $t+1/t\ge 2$. This can be proved in various ways, such as noting that $(\sqrt{t}-1/\sqrt{t})^2 \ge 0$. Each of our three groups above is of the shape $t+1/t$. We conclude that our original expression is $\ge (1/2)(3+6)-3$, which is $3/2$.

Note that the upper bound of $2$ cannot be achieved with a genuine triangle, though we can get arbitrarily close. The lower bound is achieved in the equilateral case.

share|cite|improve this answer
thanks..but according to my solution using triangle property , upper bound is coming 3. what is wrong in my solution? – vikiiii Mar 8 '12 at 17:43
@vikiiii: You gave a correct proof that $3$ is an upper bound. You did not prove that there is no cheaper upper bound, and in fact there is, namely $2$. Roughly speaking, we cannot have simultaneously $p+q\approx r$, $q+r\approx p$, and $r+q\approx p$ (all in the sense of ratio). For then $2p+2q+2r\approx p+q+r$, which is impossible. More informally, suppose, as we can, that $p+q+r=1$. If $p+q\approx r$ and $q+r\approx p$, then $p+2q+r\approx p+r$, so $q\approx 0$ and $p\approx r\approx 1/2$. – André Nicolas Mar 8 '12 at 17:55
thanks for the answer.:) – vikiiii Mar 8 '12 at 18:18

The expression can be simplified in another way as shown, $$\frac{p}{q+r}+\frac{r}{q+p}+\frac{q}{p+r}$$

$$(\frac{p}{q+r}+1)+(\frac{r}{q+p}+1)+(\frac{q}{p+r}+1) - 3$$



Applying Arithmetic mean greater than Harmonic mean inequality we get





For lower bound as Andre points out in the previous answer we consider the case of an equilateral triangle,to get,


share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.