Sign up ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am reading Introduction to Quantum Computing by Kaye, Laflamme, and Mosca. As an exercise, they write

"Prove that if the operators $P_{i}$ satisfy $P_{i}^{*}=P_{i}$ and $P_{i}^{2}=P_{i}$ , then $P_{i}P_{j}=0$ for $i\ne j$.''

In the context of this problem, it has been assumed that $I=\sum_{i=1}^{n} P_{i}$, where I suppose that $n$ could be infinite. I have shown that this is true in the trivial case $n=2$, but the general case has been eluding me. How should I attack this?

share|cite|improve this question

3 Answers 3

up vote 11 down vote accepted

For each $j$, $$P_j=P_jIP_j=P_j\left(\sum_{k=1}^n P_k\right)P_j=\sum_{k=1}^nP_jP_kP_j=P_j+\sum_{k\neq j}P_jP_kP_j,$$ so $\sum\limits_{k\neq j}P_jP_kP_j=0$. For each $i\neq j$, $P_jP_iP_j=(P_iP_j)^*P_iP_j$ is a positive operator, and a sum of positive operators is positive, so $-P_jP_iP_j=\sum\limits_{k\neq i,j}P_jP_kP_j$ is also positive. This is only possible if $P_jP_iP_j=0$. Since $\|P_iP_j\|^2=\|(P_iP_j)^*P_iP_j\|=\|P_jP_iP_j\|$, it follows that $P_iP_j=0$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thank you very much! – Nick Thompson Mar 8 '12 at 0:13

Because of the properties you state, $\|P_{j}x\|^{2}=(x,P_{j}x)=(P_{j}x,x)$. Therefore, $$ \|x\|^{2} = (\sum_{j}P_{j}x,x)= \sum_{j}\|P_{j}x\|^{2}. $$ Apply this identity to $x=P_{k}y$, and use the fact that $P_{k}^{2}=P_{k}$: $$ \|P_{k}y\|^{2} = \sum_{j\ne k}\|P_{j}P_{k}y\|^{2}+\|P_{k}y\|^{2}. $$ The only way this can happen is $P_{j}P_{k}y=0$ for all $j \ne k$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Here is a slight variant of Jonas’ argument.

Assume that $ p_{1},\ldots,p_{n} $ are projection elements of a unital $ C^{*} $-algebra $ A $, where $ n \in \Bbb{N}_{\geq 2} $, such that $$ \sum_{k = 1}^{n} p_{k} = 1_{A}. $$ Choose distinct $ i,j \in [n] $, where $ [n] \stackrel{\text{df}}{=} \Bbb{N}_{\leq n} $. Then \begin{align} p_{i} & = p_{i} 1_{A} \\ & = p_{i} \sum_{k \in [n]} p_{k} \\ & = \sum_{k \in [n]} p_{i} p_{k} \\ & = p_{i}^{2} + p_{i} p_{j} + \sum_{k \in [n] \setminus \{ i,j \}} p_{i} p_{k} \\ & = p_{i} + p_{i} p_{j} + \sum_{k \in [n] \setminus \{ i,j \}} p_{i} p_{k}. \end{align} It follows that $$ p_{i} p_{j} p_{j}^{*} = p_{i} p_{j} = - \sum_{k \in [n] \setminus \{ i,j \}} p_{i} p_{k} = - \sum_{k \in [n] \setminus \{ i,j \}} p_{i} p_{k} p_{k}^{*}, $$ and consequently, $$ (\spadesuit) \qquad (p_{i} p_{j}) (p_{i} p_{j})^{*} = p_{i} p_{j} p_{j}^{*} p_{i}^{*} = - \sum_{k \in [n] \setminus \{ i,j \}} p_{i} p_{k} p_{k}^{*} p_{i}^{*} = - \sum_{k \in [n] \setminus \{ i,j \}} (p_{i} p_{k}) (p_{i} p_{k})^{*}. $$ On the extreme left of $ (\spadesuit) $, we have a positive element, while on the extreme right of $ (\spadesuit) $, we have a negative element. This can only mean that both extremes are zero, so $ (p_{i} p_{j}) (p_{i} p_{j})^{*} = 0_{A} $. Hence, $$ \| p_{i} p_{j} \|_{A}^{2} = \| (p_{i} p_{j}) (p_{i} p_{j})^{*} \|_{A} = \| 0_{A} \|_{A} = 0, $$ or equivalently, $ p_{i} p_{j} = 0_{A} $.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.