Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I was told in another post that Galois theory could help you solve solvable polynomials, and that solvable polynomials had roots that could be expressed as functions of rational numbers, but that it couldn't help me solve a polynomial with rational roots. It cannot help me solve polynomials with roots that couldn't be expressed with radicals. So doesn't that leave me with only polynomials with roots that ARE expressed in radical that Galois theory can help me solve? In other words, does a polynomial's roots HAVE to contain at least one radical for Galois theory to help you solve it?

share|improve this question
    
Did you read the exposition I had linked you to? –  user21436 Mar 7 '12 at 18:43
    
I tried to read it, but I can't follow it too well because I don't even know abstract algebra very well. I'm asking this question because it seems like I'm getting conflicting information from different people. I was told that Galois theory can't help you solve polynomials with rational roots (not coefficients), but that it can help you solve solvable polynomials, and finally that polynomials with rational roots are solvable. –  Kenny Mar 7 '12 at 19:02
4  
I would advise you to wait and figure it out for yourself. The point is you might not understand it well enough to know if you're getting really conflicting answers. Patience is the key here and I have nothing to say. : ) –  user21436 Mar 7 '12 at 19:07
    
This will be an unsatisfactory and circular answer, but I think it's worth saying anyhow: Galois theory has more to do with answering your question ("when can we solve for the roots of a polynomial?") than it is about actually finding the roots of polynomials. So to really understand when Galois theory is useful for finding roots, you will have to understand Galois theory itself. –  Brett Frankel Mar 7 '12 at 19:25
1  
Here's the link to the other post: math.stackexchange.com/q/117592/22405 –  Brett Frankel Mar 7 '12 at 19:28

1 Answer 1

up vote 4 down vote accepted

Let's look at an example. Does Galois Theory help you solve $x^2-3x+1=0$? In a sense, it does; you could use Galois Theory to analyze that equation and eventually to write down its solutions. But you'd be insane to do that: it's ever so much simpler to just write down the answers given by the quadratic formula. Moreover, there is no way that someone who doesn't already know the quadratic formula is going to be able to understand the Galois Theory approach to this equation.

Now for a polynomial whose roots are all rational, it's even worse. The Galois group is trivial, and it basically tells you that the way to find the roots is to use the rational root theorem.

So I could say, yes, Galois Theory helps you solve the equation; it helps you by telling you to use the rational root theorem. You might reply, Galois Theory doesn't help you solve the equation; all it does it tell you to use the rational root theorem. We would agree on the mathematics, and disagree on the interpretation. I don't think we can take it much further than that.

share|improve this answer
    
Okay, that makes sense. –  Kenny Mar 8 '12 at 8:09

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.