Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

If $(R,m)$ is a complete local ring (with respect to the $m-$adic topology) and $I$ a prime ideal in $R$, is $R/I$ complete (with respect to the $m/I-$adic topology)? It seems too strong, but I am unable to give a counterexample.

share|cite|improve this question
complete for which topology? – seporhau Mar 7 '12 at 17:00
@seporhau: Clarified. I thought, it was convention to assume "with respect to the maximal ideal" unless otherwise specified. – Merlin Mar 7 '12 at 17:06
What you'd like to be able to do is take a Cauchy sequence in $R/I$, then lift each element so that you have a Cauchy sequence in $R$, then take the limit and push it back down to the quotient. So the question becomes: under what conditions can you lift your Cauchy sequence mod $I$ to a Cauchy sequence in $R$?. – Brett Frankel Mar 7 '12 at 21:58
The completion functor from the category of $R$-modules to the catogory of $\hat R$-modules is exact. So the quotient by an ideal $I \subset R=\hat{R}$ is complete if and only if $I$ is complete as an $\hat R$-module. I tend to think that this is always the case at least for Noetherian $R$. – Dima Sustretov Mar 7 '12 at 22:29
@DimaSustretov: Thank you. – Merlin Mar 8 '12 at 16:29

Proposition Let $(R, \mathfrak{m})$ be a complete Noetherian local ring. Let $I$ be a proper ideal of $R$. Then $(R/I, \mathfrak{m}/I)$ is complete.

Proof: The following sequence of $R$-modules is exact.

$0 \rightarrow I \rightarrow R \rightarrow R/I \rightarrow 0$

Since $R$ is Noethrian, the following sequence is exact, where $\hat I$ etc. are the completions of $I$ etc. with respect to $\mathfrak{m}$-adic toplogy.

$0 \rightarrow \hat I \rightarrow \hat R \rightarrow \hat (R/I) \rightarrow 0$

Since $R$ is complete, $\hat R = R$. It is well known that $I$ is a closed submodule of $R$ with respect to $\mathfrak{m}$-adic toplogy. Since $R$ is complete, so is $I$. Hence $\hat I = I$. Therefore we get the following exact sequence.

$0 \rightarrow I \rightarrow R \rightarrow \hat (R/I) \rightarrow 0$

Hence $R/I$ is complete. QED

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.