Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This question probably has a very simple answer!

I'm trying to understand the proof of the following result from Dummit and Foote, 3ed:

cor4.4.15

Here is the proposition referenced:

prop4.4.13

I don't understand the part where Proposition 13 is applied "with $N_G(H)$ playing the role of $G$". Wouldn't this only give me that $N_G(H)/C_{N_G(H)}(H)$ is isomorphic to a subgroup of $\text{Aut}(H)$? How does $C_G(H)$ appear?

Thanks for any help.

share|improve this question
2  
You are right, but if $g$ is in $C_G(H)$, then a fortiori $g$ is in $N_G(H)$, so $C_G(H) = C_{N_G(H)}(H)$. (You should write out the definitions of the two sets that I'm claiming are equal and convince yourself that they are the same.) –  William DeMeo Mar 7 '12 at 8:01
1  
$C_G(H)$ is certainly contained in $N_G(H).$ Hence $C_{N_G(H)}(H)$ is the same as $C_G(H).$ –  Geoff Robinson Mar 7 '12 at 8:03
    
Thank you Geoff and William. It is now very clear that $C_X(H) = C_G(H) \cap X$, and so $C_{N_G(H)}(H) = C_G(H) \cap N_G(H) = C_G(H)$. –  Antonio Vargas Mar 7 '12 at 8:18

1 Answer 1

up vote 4 down vote accepted

Just so the question isn't "unanswered"...

Thanks to the comments left by William DeMeo and Geoff Robinson.

We have $C_X(H) = C_G(H) \cap X$ for any $X$, so $$C_{N_G(H)}(H) = C_G(H) \cap N_G(H) = C_G(H)$$ since $C_G(H) \subseteq N_G(H)$.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.