Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I was reading up a little on reference frames and am confused about a certain detail. Is it correct to say that the positive $x$-axis, for example, can be defined as follows?

$$ X^+ = \lim_{C \rightarrow \, 0^+} C^{-1}\langle 1,0,0\rangle \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ (1) $$

Here, $\langle a_1, a_2, a_3\rangle$ represents the vector with origin at $(0,0,0)$ and terminal point at $(a_1, a_2, a_3)$. Also, this is just a question I have, not something I read. Thanks to all in advance.

share|improve this question
    
There was an error concerning $C$. I've fixed that now. –  ThisIsNotAnId Mar 7 '12 at 0:42

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

No, it wouldn't be correct to say that. Firstly, the limit of a sequence of vectors is just another vector (if it exists); and secondly, that sequence of vectors has no limit. Also, I'd say that an axis consists of points, not vectors.

So a correct alternative would be: the set $$\{(a_1,0,0)\in\mathbb{R}^3\mid a_1>0\}$$ forms the positive $x$-axis in $\mathbb{R}^3$. You could also use $$\displaystyle\bigcup_{C>0}\{C(1,0,0)\}.$$

share|improve this answer
    
Oh, yeah! I knew I was missing something. Thanks! –  ThisIsNotAnId Mar 7 '12 at 2:17
    
And, btw, really nice set of quotes on your site. –  ThisIsNotAnId Mar 7 '12 at 2:22
    
Thank you, I enjoy rereading them often :) –  Zev Chonoles Mar 7 '12 at 3:57

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.