Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

For Riemann zeta function and $L$-functions of number fields, the width of critical strip is $1$. For $L$-functions of modular forms of weight $k$, the width of the critical strip is $k$.

Why is there a variation in the width of the critical strip for various $L$-functions? Is there a conceptual explanation or an underlying heuristics?

share|cite|improve this question

Roughly speaking the critical strip is where the $L$-function is hard to compute/understand. Its right edge is the boundary of the region where the Dirichlet series/Euler product converges nicely (absolutely, locally uniformly etc). Its left edge is the image of the right edge under the functional equation (to compute it to the left of the critical strip you can use the functional equation to reduce it to comuting a nice series/product).

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.