Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I know taylor polynomial for single variable functions but I am having trouble understanding how to find taylor polynomials for multivariable functions. I know how to find partial derivatives as well as the chain rule for multivariable functions.

Can someone please explain how I can find the taylor polynomial of a multivariable function? for simplicity lets do f(x,y)=x^5-y^4

enter image description here

Above is text from my textbook that I read but it doesnt make any sense to me especially step 3 and 4

If you know of a site or source that can better explain how to find multivariable function's taylor series I would appreciate that so that this way you dont spend so much time in typing explanation for me.

share|improve this question
    
One of my uncertainties is exactly what is tripping you up in trying to understand (3) and (4). All four equations are the exact same: the function on the left-hand side is being considered as solely a function of either $x$ or $y$, and you take the expansion of that function and put it on the right. My assumption is that you didn't realize you could take partial derivatives of something like $f_x(x_0,y)$ with respect to $y$ - is that accurate? –  anon Mar 4 '12 at 9:43
    
Instead of doing such long equations in the book I prefer that would write the steps as to what to do to find the taylor polynomial. for example, given this function, take its partial derivatives with respect to x and add them up, take the partial derivatives with respect to y and add those up, then multiply the sum of the derivatives...I am having trouble following the steps because of so much arithmatic, if I was told in simple steps of what to do then i can do those rather than follow up with all the lines trying to figure out what happened. –  Raynos Mar 4 '12 at 13:41
    
The assumption you mentioned, you mean if you have fx(0,0) then u can differentiate it with respect to y because it would have a y in it? if there is no y in there the expression is 0 because x would be a constant –  Raynos Mar 4 '12 at 13:44
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 0 down vote accepted

We can fix $y$ and then consider $f(x,y)$ to be strictly a function of $x$ (say $h(x)=f(x,y)$ if you want, which makes sense because $y$ is fixed somewhere). Doing this yields the Taylor expansion seen in equation $(1)$. We would say that, by the usual formula, we have

$$h(x)=h(x_0)+h'(x_0)(x-x_0)+h''(x_0)(x-x_0)^2+\cdots \tag{0}$$

Now $h(x_0)=f(x_0,y)$ and $h'(x_0)=f_x(x_0,y)$ and $h''(x_0)=f_{xx}(x_0,y)$ and so forth. Now notice that this works regardless of what we fixed $y$ at to begin with, so it must hold for all available $y$.

We will switch gears now; since the formula holds for all $y$ we no longer need to consider $y$ fixed.

The Taylor expansion in the variable $x$ seen in $(0)$ involves a number of terms like $f_{xx}(x_0,y)$. Now we know that $x_0$ is fixed but $y$ is not, so this is a function of $y$! Say $g(y)=f_{xx}(x_0,y)$. Then we can speak of its Taylor expansion just as well, $g(y)=g(y_0)+g'(y)(y-y_0)+g''(y)(y-y_0)+\cdots$.

It turns out that $g(y_0)=f_{xx}(x_0,y_0)$ and $g'(y_0)=f_{xxy}(x_0,y_0)$ and $g''(y_0)=f_{xxyy}(x_0,y_0)$ and so on, because taking partial derivatives commutes with "evaluating at $y=y_0$" (or $x=x_0$, as in the last part). This means that differentiation and plugging things in can be done in any order here.

Doing a Taylor series expansion in the variable $y$ for $f_{xx}(x_0,y)$, as seen in $(4)$, can be done with any of the terms in $(1)$, like $f(x_0,y)$ and $f_x(x_0,y)$ seen in $(2)$ and $(3)$.

I have assumed that $f$ is sufficiently nice in this answer.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.