Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

The length of any curve that goes from A to B (other than the line segment AB) is greater than the length of that segment. This statement may be a theorem? Or, necessarily, is an axiom? It seems to me that any attempt to build a theorem eventually turning into begging.

Thank you very much!

Paulo Argolo

share|cite|improve this question
The proof of Oprea's "Theorem 1.1.11" here is instructive. – J. M. Nov 24 '10 at 3:01

It's a consequence of the so-called triangle inequality.

share|cite|improve this answer

This is a (simple) theorem. See

share|cite|improve this answer
@Ricky: Not using the definition of curve length the fact that the lower curve from A to B is the line segment AB? – Paulo Argolo Nov 23 '10 at 23:55
What do you mean by "the lower curve from A to B"? And what about that fact? – Ricky Demer Nov 23 '10 at 23:58
@Ricky: I'm trying to say this: to establish the definition of length of a curve is allowed, a priori, that the curve of shortest length, which goes from A to B, is exactly the line segment AB. – Paulo Argolo Nov 24 '10 at 0:16
No, you can have a length of a curve in a non-Eucledian metric space so that the line segment either won't be the shortest curve, or won't be the only shortest curve. – trutheality Nov 24 '10 at 2:45

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.