Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am trying to write a small article, and I just want to know how would be a good way to present the maths I have written so that it looks professional.

I am trying to define a sequence $x_n$ of real numbers. So what I wrote in my article is:

Let $x_n$, $n \in \mathbb{N}$ be a sequence of real numbers.

However, it does not look very professional. How would I write the above sentence into something that looks professional? Note: I need to include $n \in \mathbb{N}$ in my sentence, so I think thats where my trouble is as $x_n$, $n \in \mathbb{N}$ seems a bit messy.

Thanks.

share|improve this question
3  
I prefer to present a sequence as $(x_n)_{n\in \mathbb{N}}$ (the parentheses are used to mean that a sequence is "ordered" in some way, just like finite $n$-tuples do). Other people use also $\{x_n\}_{n\in \mathbb{N}}$ (but I don't like this symbol, because curly brackets always denote sets and sets are not necessarily "ordered"). –  Pacciu Mar 3 '12 at 15:29
    
Is it an infinite sequence? Then maybe let $x_n$, where $n$ ranges over $\mathbb{N}$, be real numbers. Using more symbols is not necessarily more professional. –  André Nicolas Mar 3 '12 at 15:31
    
Thanks for your help guys! Yes it is an infinite sequence. –  Gary Mar 3 '12 at 15:47
    
Just to add to the previous answers, in the Z formal specification language, curly brackets denote a set and angle brackets denote a sequence. copied from this link (3rd Paragraph) –  Alma Rahat May 9 '13 at 14:40
add comment

2 Answers

up vote 3 down vote accepted

I write my sequences as $\langle x_n \mid n \in \mathbb{N} \rangle$. Looks pretty cool I think. So you could say let $\langle x_n \mid n \in \mathbb{N} \rangle$ be a sequence in $\mathbb{R}$.

share|improve this answer
    
Notation $\langle \cdot \mid \cdot \rangle$ is used by physicists to denote inner product in the sequences space $\ell^2$; also, most mathematicians use the angular brackets $\langle \cdot ,\cdot \rangle$ to denote the inner product in a Hilbert space (hence also in $\ell^2$). Hence, IMHO, the notation you use can be very ambiguous. –  Pacciu Mar 3 '12 at 17:41
    
I probably use this more since this is the standard notation for sequences in set theory. –  Paul Slevin Mar 3 '12 at 18:07
    
I think it's not too ambiguous in this case. Probably no one would denote an inner product with $n \in \mathbb{N}$ in one of the sides of the angular brackets. –  user1620696 May 9 '13 at 15:05
    
Big angle brackets is how Lamport denotes sequences in the TLA+ ecosystem. Of course he goes through great pains to make it clear a sequence is formally a function $x: \mathbb{N}\rightarrow S$ –  Michael Deardeuff Sep 13 '13 at 22:26
add comment

The notation $\{x_n\}_{n\in\mathbb{N} }$ is appropriate because a sequence is formally a function $x: \mathbb{N}\rightarrow S$, i.e., from the natural numbers to some set $S$. The first notation corresponds to a set of numbers $\{x_n\}$ (the curly brackets do denote a set) indexed by the natural numbers.

Note also that the space of all real-valued sequences can be denoted as $\mathbb{R}^\mathbb{N}$, i.e., the set of all functions from the natural numbers $\mathbb{N}$ to the real numbers $\mathbb{R}$. See also this discussion: What does it mean when a set is the exponent?

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.