Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Given $c \in \mathbb{R}$ and $m,n \in \mathbb{N}$, is it possible to combine the inequations

  • $n < m$
  • $\frac{8}{c} < m$

into one inequation?

I argued that due $n < m$ and $\frac{8}{c} < m$, there has to be one $n$ between $m$ and $\frac{8}{c}$, being $n = \left\lceil \frac{8}{c} \right\rceil$, so that $m > n > \frac{8}{c}$, but I'm not sure if that is correct.


$\forall c \in R^{+} \exists n \in \mathbb{N}: \forall m \in \mathbb{N} \land m > n: |f(m)|< c*|g(m)) \implies f \in \mathcal{o}(g)$

So, this is about the landau-notation of $f(x)$ raises slower than $g(x)$, the task is to show that a specific case ($f(x) = 8x$ and $g(x) = x^2$) complies to this definition.

Note: I already solved it until I encounter both inequations together and want to show that there is an $n$ for all cases.

share|cite|improve this question
Yes, $m>\max(n,8/c)$. – AD. Nov 23 '10 at 21:50
$m>n>\frac{8}{c}$ cannot hold because of two cases, those being $\frac{8}{c}=n$ and $n<\frac{8}{c}$. – Ralth Nov 23 '10 at 21:58
I think I see your misunderstanding. You know that $m>\frac{8}{c}$ implies what you want, but you need want a natural number. Take the next largest one, $n = \lceil\frac{8}{c} \rceil$ as you said before. Remember, for a given $c$, you only have to find a single $n$ that will work and any will do. – Ralth Nov 23 '10 at 22:50
Thanks Ralth, that helped to see my mistake. – Femaref Nov 24 '10 at 13:12
up vote 1 down vote accepted

Nope. What if $m=2$, $c=7$?

There's really no way of finding out the what the relationship b/w $n$ and $8/c$ is without additional information.

Also, the task of finding an $n$ that satisfies certain properties is very different from the task of determining whether $n$ satisfies certain properties. (It's the difference between "there exists" and "for all").

Edit RE: Your edits:

If I understand you correctly, what you actually need is to find an $n$ such that $n<m \Rightarrow \frac8c<m$. Then $n = \lfloor \frac8c \rfloor$ should satisfy that.

share|cite|improve this answer

So, you need to show that for every $c>0 \in \mathbb{R}$ there exists $n \in \mathbb{R}^+$ such that $|f(x)|<c|g(x)|$ for all $x>n$. Given a $c>0$, let $n=\frac{8}{c}$.

Then... $x>n \implies |f(x)|<c|g(x)|$

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.