Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'd like to know how one would go about showing that the following function, $f$, that is almost everywhere positive exists:

$$g(x_1,\cdots,x_n)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \prod _{j=1}^nf(u-x_j)du$$ where $g:\mathbb{R}^n:\rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ satisfies:

(1) $g(x_1,\cdots,x_n)$ is the derivative is the nth order partial derivative of $\frac{\partial \ln(G(e^{x_1},\cdots,e^{x_n})}{\partial x_1x_2...x_n}$; where $G(e^{x_1},\cdots,e^{x_n})$ is symmetric, homogenous of degree 1, $G(0)=0$, $\lim G(y)\rightarrow \infty$ as $y \rightarrow \infty$, $G(y)>0$.

(2) $g\ge0$

If this isn't possible, can you suggest of ways to add restrictions so that such an $f$ exists? I know this is asking a lot, but I was wondering if someone would be willing to give some direction.

Thanks so much in advance!!!!!

share|improve this question
    
Did you try in $\mathbb R^2$ with $g(x,y)=(x^2+y^2)^{-1/2}$? –  Davide Giraudo Mar 1 '12 at 19:20
    
@DavideGiraudo I think he wants to show the existence of $f$ given $g$. –  Stuck_pls_help Mar 1 '12 at 19:32
    
I think it's indeed what the OP wants, but I don't think there is $f$ in this case. –  Davide Giraudo Mar 1 '12 at 19:34
    
You guys are right. I'm relaxing the homogeneity assumption. –  user25720 Mar 1 '12 at 19:46
add comment

1 Answer

This is far from a complete answer. The purpose is to identify additional necessary conditions for $g$ such that it has the postulated form.

You will need to assume that $g$ is symmetric in its arguments, since the integral of the product has this property.

In addition, your function $g$ must satisfy the simple condition $g(x_1+t,x_2+t, \dots, x_n+t) = g(x_1,x_2, \dots, x_n)$ for all $t$ and all $x$ (use a change of variables in the integral).

Moreover, $g$ must satisfy various moment inequalities. For example, if $n = 2$, then $g$ must satisfy $g(x_1,x_2) \le \sqrt{g(x_1,x_1)g(x_2,x_2)} = g(0,0)$ for all $x = (x_1,x_2)$, by Cauchy-Schwarz. More such necessary conditions come from Hoelder's inequality in $n > 2$.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks for the suggestions. Actually $g$ does satisfy these properties. I made the question much more clear by explicitly specifying $G$. Thanks so much again. –  user25720 Mar 11 '12 at 20:40
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.