Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I need a simple proof that a line cannot intersect a circle at three distinct points.

share|improve this question
    
With algebra, you can substitute in the equation of the circle, get a quadratic. But then you have to show a quadratic cannot have more than $2$ roots. –  André Nicolas Mar 1 '12 at 17:50
6  
Counterexample: the unit circle intersects the $y$-axis in $4$ points $(0,\pm1),\:(0,\pm4)$ over $\mathbb Z/15\qquad$ –  Bill Dubuque Mar 1 '12 at 22:36
    
@BillDubuque i did't understand how unit circle intersects the x axis in 4points. –  Saurabh Jun 4 '12 at 20:02
    
@SaurabhHota $\rm\:x^2 + y^2 = 1\:$ has solutions $\rm\:(x,y) = (0,\pm1),\ (0,\pm4)\:$ in integers modulo $15.$ –  Bill Dubuque Jun 4 '12 at 20:30

4 Answers 4

up vote 4 down vote accepted

Similar to Harald's proof, draw in a radius from the center of the circle to each point where the line intersects the circle. Now draw a perpendicular segment from the center to a point C on the line. Assuming we have more than one point of intersection, we have multiple right triangles which are congruent due to the HL theorem. Clearly we can't have a third point of intersection because there cannot be 3 distinct points along the line equidistant from C.

share|improve this answer

Or a more geometric proof: If a circle intersects a line in $A$ and $B$, the center of the circle lies on the center normal of the line segment $AB$. If there is a third intersection point $C$, the center of the circle must also lie on the center normal of $BC$. But these two center normals are distinct parallel lines, and cannot have point in common.

share|improve this answer

Without loss of generality, assume the circle is $x^2 + y^2 = r^2$ and the line is $y = mx + c$.

The x coordinates of the point of intersection satisfy $x^2 + (mx+c)^2 = r^2$ which is a quadratic and hence has at most $2$ roots.

Since given an $x$, the $y$ on the line is uniquely determined, we are done.

share|improve this answer
1  
I always read “with loss of generality” when I see “wlog”. So I use “wolog” instead. But in some sense, “wlog” is more correct. –  Harald Hanche-Olsen Mar 1 '12 at 17:56
    
@HaraldHanche-Olsen: You are right, there is ambiguity there :-) –  Aryabhata Mar 1 '12 at 17:58

Take any 3 distinct points on a circle and notice that each angle of the triangle formed by those 3 points is higher than 0 and smaller than 180 degrees. Any of the angles formed by 3 distinct points on a line (degenerate triangle) takes a value of either 0 degrees or 180 degrees.

The proof is complete.

share|improve this answer
    
It seesm to me that you postulate what you want to prove. why are all angles of suche a triangle greater than 0 and smaller then 180 degrees? –  miracle173 Sep 20 '13 at 19:39
    
-1 justified in my previous comment –  miracle173 Sep 23 '13 at 21:14

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.