Tell me more ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I know that this is meant to explain variance butthe description on Wikpiedia stinks and it is not clear how you can explain variance using this technique

Can anyone explain it in a simple way?

share|improve this question
3  
When you refer to a Wiki article, you should always link to it – Casebash Jul 29 '10 at 13:15
1  
This question might be better asked on the stats site. Although not an exact dupe, the answers to "What are principal component scores" may help. – walkytalky Jul 29 '10 at 17:16
1  
The Wikipedia article is admittedly not great; but other Google results might be better, like ordination.okstate.edu/PCA.htm . In any case, it might be a good idea as walkytalky says to ask this question on the stats site. – Qiaochu Yuan Jul 29 '10 at 17:53
PCA itself is a mathematical technique, primarily used by statisticians, so while I agree that more statisticians would probably be able to answer this question, I think a description/explanation of PCA falls under mathematics, and it is not off-topic here. – Larry Wang Jul 29 '10 at 23:44
This question got some good answers on the stats site at stats.stackexchange.com/q/2691/919 . They supplement the nice one provided by @Kaestur Hakarl here. – whuber Jan 6 '11 at 19:38

3 Answers

up vote 5 down vote accepted

Principal component analysis is a useful technique when dealing with large datasets. In some fields, (bioinformatics, internet marketing, etc) we end up collecting data which has many thousands or tens of thousands of dimensions. Manipulating the data in this form is not desirable, because of practical considerations like memory and CPU time. However, we can't just arbitrarily ignore dimensions either. We might lose some of the information we are trying to capture!

Principal component analysis is a common method used to manage this tradeoff. The idea is that we can somehow select the 'most important' directions, and keep those, while throwing away the ones that contribute mostly noise.

For example, this picture shows a 2D dataset being mapped to one dimension: alt text
Note that the dimension chosen was not one of the original two: in general, it won't be, because that would mean your variables were uncorrelated to begin with.
We can also see that the direction of the principal component is the one that maximizes the variance of the projected data. This is what we mean by 'keeping as much information as possible.'

share|improve this answer

Unfortunately I can also post one hyperlink per answer - so here is another one: Also have a look at:
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1358533 esp. p. 3f

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.